Last updated on: 17th November
Interights
Interights - How you can help
COMMONWEALTHNET

A monthly round up of recent significant human rights decisions from common law jurisdictions. If you are interested in receiving this and other Commonwealth-related information from INTERIGHTS by email, why not subscribe to our e-bulletin, the CommonwealthNet. To do this, please send an email to:
commonwealthnet@interights.org. For cases from , click here.

July

June

May

April

March

February

January 2006
December 2005
November

October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January

July

Last updated 27 July

 

AUSTRALIA

L v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission
FCAFC 114
Federal Court, 12 July : FAIR HEARING, LEGAL REPRESENTATION; DISABILITY

Denial of due process in failing to appoint litigation guardian to represent interests of applicant allegedly suffering from mental disability.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2006/114.html

 

SZDPB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
FCAFC 110
Federal Court, 3 July : REFUGEES; FAIR HEARING

Reasonable for applicants to relocate to another part of country of origin; whether applicants can avoid persecution by discreet behaviour is irrelevant to consideration of relocation; where a different language is spoken in relocation area appropriate to take into account applicant’s success in relocating to receiving country.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2006/110.html

 

CANADA

Goodis v Ontario (Ministry of Correctional Services)
SCC 31
Supreme Court, 7 July : INFORMATION; PRIVACY, PRIVILEGE

Records subject to a claim of solicitor‑client privilege may be disclosed only where absolutely necessary including in access to information cases.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2006/2006scc31.html

 

United Mexican States v Ortega; United States of America v Fiessel
SCC 34
Supreme Court, 21 July : LIBERTY & SECURITY; EXTRADITION; FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE

Extradition treaty should require that evidence tendered at committal hearing should be certified as available for trial in requesting state.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2006/2006scc34.html

 

United States of America v Ferras; United States of America v Latty
SCC 33
Supreme Court, 21 July : LIBERTY & SECURITY; EXTRADITION; FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE

Extradition process afforded sufficient guarantees; prima facie case made out based on unsworn statements from law enforcement agents summarising the evidence expected to be presented at each trial. 

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2006/2006scc33.html

 

HONG KONG

Koo Sze Yiu & Anor v Chief Executive of the HKSAR
FACV 12&13/
Court of Final Appeal, 12 July : PRIVACY

Covert surveillance legislation declared unconstitutional; temporary validity order set aside.

Full text at http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/en/hkcfa/2006/FACV000013_2006.html

 

So Wai Lun v HKSAR
FACC No. 5 of
Court of Final Appeal, 18 July : FAIR HEARING, EQUALITY; LIBERTY & SECURITY

Absolute criminal liability for males engaging in sex with underage females did not breach equal protection under the law or arbitrariness.

Full text at http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/en/hkcfa/2006/FACC000005_2005.html

 

INDIA

Employees State Insurance Corporation v Distilleries & Chemical Mazdoor Union & Ors
Appeal (civil) 1727 of
Supreme Court, 17 July : HEALTH; WORK

Company providing medical facilities to employees in accordance with previous Court order not required to contribute to Employees State Insurance scheme.

Full text at http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=27857

 

Manager RBI v Sharma & Anor
Appeal (civil) 7902 of
Supreme Court, 17 July : EQUALITY; WORK

Concept of equal pay for equal work could not be extended to confer permanency on those who have been appointed on ad hoc or temporary basis.

Full text at http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=27856

 

Salodkar v Monsanto Chemicals of India & Ors
WP 2820/2003
Bombay High Court, 12 July : LIFE; HEALTH; ENVIRONMENT; REMEDIES

Public interest litigation highlighting failure of state to properly regulate hazardous industry with resulting detrimental impact on environment and public health; detailed orders handed down.

Full text at http://tempweb55.nic.in/data/judgements/2006/CWP3870002.pdf


Singh v State of UP & Anor
Writ Petition (crl.) 208 of 2004
Supreme Court, 7 July 2006: WOMEN; LIFE; LIBERTY & SECURITY; MARRIAGE; EQUALITY

Duty of state to protect woman and her family from violence and threats resulting from inter-caste marriage; criticism of caste system.

Full text at http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=27831

State of J & K & Ors v Ahmed Mir
Appeal (civil) 6642 of 2004
Supreme Court, 17 July 2006: EQUALITY; WORK

Appointment on compassionate grounds cannot be claimed as a matter of right but process should meet constitutional test.

Full text at http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=27858

 

IRELAND

A v The Governor of Arbour Hill Prison
[2006] IESC 45
Supreme Court, 10 July 2006: FAIR HEARING, RETROSPECTIVITY

Concluded criminal or civil proceedings based on an enactment subsequently found to be unconstitutional cannot normally be reopened; conviction and sentence based on law subsequ ently held to be unconstitutional upheld.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/2006/S45.html

 

McGrath v Irish Ispat Ltd
[2006] IESC 43
Supreme Court, 10 July 2006: FAIR HEARING, DELAY

Plaintiff’s claim struck out for want of prosecution based on inexcusable delay.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/2006/S43.html

 

NEW ZEALAND

The Queen v Bryan and Ors
[2006] NZCA 161
Court of Appeal, 6 July 2006: LIBERTY & SECURITY, SENTENCING

Application of sentencing principles in serious drug offences case.

Full text at http://www.commonlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2006/161.html

 

The Queen v Miessen
[2006] NZCA 163
Court of Appeal, 6 July 2006: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE; SELF INCRIMINATION

No grounds for excluding eye-witness account of the actus reus of the alleged offence as breaching right to be protected against self incrimination under Bill of Rights.

Full text at http://www.commonlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2006/163.html

 

The Queen v Sharma
[2006] NZCA 164
Court of Appeal, 6 July 2006: FAIR HEARING, EQUALITY OF ARMS, BIAS

Inability to cross examine directly child victims in domestic violence case did not unduly prejudice accused; no evidence of judicial bias but inadequate answer to jury question by judge, taken together with other incidents, could lead to a conclusion of miscarriage of justice on one count.

Full text at http://www.commonlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2006/164.html

 

The Queen v Te Nahu
[2006] NZCA 160
Court of Appeal, 6 July 2006: LIBERTY & SECURITY, SENTENCING

Application of sentencing guidelines in drug offences case.

Full text at http://www.commonlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2006/160.html

 

SAMOA

Papu v Police
[2006] WSSC 39
Supreme Court, 10 July 2006: LIBERTY & SECURITY, BAIL

Consideration and denial of bail application in murder case.

Full text at http://www.paclii.org/ws/cases/WSSC/2006/39.html

 

TRINIDAD & TOBAGO

Central Broadcasting Services Ltd & Anor v Attorney General
[2006] UKPC 35
Privy Council, 4 July 2006: EQUALITY; EXPRESSION; RELIGION

Arbitrary denial of broadcasting licence to Hindu radio station breached free expression.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2006/35.html

 

Cooper & Anor v Director of Personnel Administration & Anor
[2006] UKPC 37
Privy Council, 6 July 2006: SEPARATION OF POWERS

Public Service Examination Board should be appointed by Police Service Commission and not Cabinet.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2006/37.html

 

 

UNITED KINGDOM

 

Barracks v Coles & Anor
[2006] EWCA Civ 1041
Court of Appeal, 21 July 2006: FAIR HEARING, DISCLOSURE; EQUALITY, RACE

No right to disclosure of security vetting information in race discrimination case.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/1041.html

 

Bath & North East Somerset Council v Connors & Ors
[2006] EWHC 1595 (QB)
High Court, 5 July 2006: HOUSING; MINORITIES; ENVIRONMENT

Local council not under a duty to provide Roma with a site which would encourage illegal action by others to the detriment of the protection of the environmental rights of the communit y.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2006/1595.html

 

Boum v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2006] ScotCS CSOH 111
Court of Session, 18 July 2006: REFUGEES; RELIGION; HOUSING

Forcible eviction on religious grounds followed by recovery of possession did not amount to persecution.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/2006/CSOH_111.html

 

Director of Public Prosecutions v Collins
[2006] UKHL 40
House of Lords, 19 July 2006: EXPRESSION; PRIVACY

Criminalisation of sending grossly offensive (including racist) messages by means of a public electronic communications network is a justified restriction on free expression.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2006/40.html

 

Down Lisburn Health and Social Services Trust & Anor v H & Anor ( Northern Ireland)
[2006] UKHL 36
House of Lords, 12 July 2006: CHILDREN; FAMILY LIFE

Procedure freeing a child for adoption and dispensing with parental consent upheld in child's best interests and justified under Article 8 ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2006/36.html

 

Dr D, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health
[2006] EWCA Civ 989
Court of Appeal, 19 July 2006: PRIVACY

Disclosure to doctor’s prospective employer of unsubstantiated accusations of sexual assault on female patients made against him found to be justified.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/989.html

 

Forbes v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2006] EWCA Civ 962
Court of Appeal, 11 July 2006: PRIVACY; EQUALITY

Notification requirements following conviction for importing child pornography justified.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/962.html

 

Gedara, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2006] EWHC 1690 (Admin)
High Court, 10 July 2006: REFUGEES; LIFE

Former intelligence officer given sufficient protection by state of origin.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2006/1690.html

 

Hirst v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor
[2006] EWCA Civ 945
Court of Appeal, 6 July 2006: LIBERTY & SECURITY, DELAY

Recall to custody scheme compatible with Article 5(4) ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/945.html

 

HK v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2006] EWCA Civ 1037
Court of Appeal, 20 July 2006: REFUGEES; CRUEL OR INHUMAN TREATMENT

Tribunal erred in rejecting clear and substantial evidence that asylum seeker faced breach of Article 3 ECHR if returned to Sierra Leone.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/1037.html

 

Horvath, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
[2006] EWHC 1833 (Admin)
High Court, 21 July 2006: EQUALITY; PROPERTY

Failure to apply provisions relating to public rights of way among the factors that may lead to a reduction in a farmer's Common Agricultural Policy subsidies uniformly across the United Kingdom could potentially give rise to claim of discrimination.

F ull text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2006/1833.html

 

JB, R (on the application of) v Responsible Medical Officer
[2006] EWCA Civ 961
Court of Appeal, 11 July 2006: MENTAL HEALTH; PRIVACY; CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT

Court’s duty to conduct a full merits review as to whether proposed treatment of a mentally ill patient infringed the latter's human rights did not always require the hearing and testing of oral medical evidence.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/961.html

 

Johnson & Ors, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Havering
[2006] EWHC 1714 (Admin)
High Court, 11 July 2006: LIFE; CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT; PRIVATE & FAMILY LIFE

Transfer of care home to private sector should not result in diminution in the patients' ECHR rights protection or corresponding obligation of local authority.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2006/1714.html

 

Kumar, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs
[2006] EWCA Civ 990
Court of Appeal, 13 July 2006: CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT; LIBERTY & SECURITY; FAIR HEARING; PRIVACY, FAMILY LIFE & HOME; EXPRESSION; EDUCATION

Detention of passport and refusal to process appeal against the refusal of a student visa did not breach any of applicant’s ECHR rights.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/990.html

 

Monarch Energy Ltd v Powergen Retail Limited
[2006] CSOH 102
Court of Session, 6 July 2006: FAIR HEARING, ACCESS TO JUSTICE

Security for expenses is a legitimate and proportionate restriction on right to access a court.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/2006/CSOH_102.html

 

NS v MI
[2006] EWHC 1646 (Fam)
High Court, 5 July 2006: WOMEN; MARRIAGE; LIBERTY & SECURITY

Forced marriage grounds for divorce where evidence of duress.

Full text at http://www.interights.org/doc/nsmi.doc

 

Prenga v The Republic of Albania
[2006] EWHC (Admin) 1616
High Court, 3 July 2006: EXTRADITION; EVIDENCE; TORTURE

Extradition decision upheld where conviction in requesting country was based on other evidence beyond confession probably obtained through use of torture.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2006/1616.html

 

Smith v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor
[2006] UKHL 35
House of Lords, 12 July 2006: FAMILY LIFE

Failure to provide adequate levels of child support payment did not breach recipients’ right to family life.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2006/35.html

 

TB, R (on the application of) v The Combined Court at Stafford
[2006] EWHC 1645 (Admin)
High Court, 4 July 2006: PRIVACY; HEALTH

Procedure for production of medical records in sexual offences prosecution did not breach Article 8 ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2006/1645.html

 

Toth v Jarman
[2006] EWCA Civ 1028
Court of Appeal, 19 July 2006: FAIR HEARING; WITNESS; INDEPENDENCE & IMPARTIALITY

Expert witness called by the parties does not need to satisfy the same test of independence as a judge.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/1028.html

June 2006

Last updated 1 July 2006.

AUSTRALIA

Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales; Batistatos v Newcastle City Council
[2006] HCA 27
High Court, 14 June 2006: FAIR HEARING, DELAY

Factors to be considered in determining whether delay of 29 years in bringing action precluded conduct of fair trial and amounted to abuse of process.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/27.html

 

Island Maritime Limited v Filipowski; Kulkarni v Filipowski
[2006] HCA 30
High Court, 15 June 2006: FAIR HEARING, DOUBLE JEOPARDY

Accused not at risk of double jeopardy where no possibility of conviction on first set of charges brought against them.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/30.html

 

Koroitamana v Commonwealth of Australia
[2006] HCA 28
High Court, 14 June 2006: NATIONALITY; CHILDREN

Stateless children born in receiving country but not citizens were aliens for purposes of immigration legislation.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/28.html

 

XYZ v The Commonwealth
[2006] HCA 25
High Court, 13 June 2006: EXTRA TERRITORIALITY

Consideration of international law principles on extra territorial legislation in context of sexual offences committed outside jurisdiction.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/25.html

 

CANADA

Minister of Citizenship and Immigration v Harkat
2006 FCA 215
Federal Court of Appeal, 9 June 2006: LIBERTY & SECURITY

No threat to national security justifying continued detention of terror suspect who could be released on strict conditions pending hearing of appeal in deportation proceedings.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fca/2006/2006fca215.html

 

Premakumaran v Canada
2006 FCA 213
Federal Court of Appeal, 9 June 2006: EQUALITY; MIGRATION

Skilled migrants forced to take menial jobs upon arrival to survive were not treated unfairly or misled by Immigration system.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fca/2006/2006fca213.html

 

Sawridge Band v Canada
2006 FCA 228
Federal Court of Appeal, 19 June 2006: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE; INDIGENOUS PEOPLE

Trial judge correctly excluded witness evidence as irrelevant in claim by indigenous people challenging statutory abrogation of tribal membership.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fca/2006/2006fca228.html

 

INDIA

Acharya & Ors v State of Karnataka & Ors
Appeal (civil) 1389 of 2006
Supreme Court, 12 May 2006: EQUALITY; EMPLOYMENT

Revision of teachers’ pay and pension with retrospective effect was arbitrary and discriminatory.

Full text at http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=27756

 

 

Lingegowd Detective & Security Chamber (P) Limited v Mysore Kirloskar Limited & Ors
Appeal (civil) 4494 of 2000
Supreme Court, 4 May 2006: EMPLOYMENT; LIVELIHOOD

Scope of minimum wage scheme.

Full text at http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=27713

 

Reddy v Dr Laxman & Ors
Appeal (civil) 2475 of 2006
Supreme Court, 5 May 2006: POLITICAL PARTICIPATION

Witness could be summoned to give evidence as to whom he voted for in election but could not be compelled to answer pursuant to right to secret ballot.

Full text at http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=27725 and http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=27728

 

Siraj v High Court of Kerala & Ors
Appeal (civil) 2539-2540 of 2005
Supreme Court, 23 May 2006: EQUALITY; EMPLOYMENT; EDUCATION

Selection scheme based on academic merit upheld as not contravening constitutional protection of reserved seats for “backward classes” and scheduled castes etc.

Full text at http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=27775

 

UP State Sugar Corporation Ltd & Anor v Raj Singh & Ors
Appeal (civil) 6588 of 2003
Supreme Court, 12 May 2006: EQUALITY; EDUCATION; EMPLOYMENT

Educational qualifications are a relevant criteria for determining payment of wages.

Full text at http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=27767

 

NEW ZEALAND

The Queen v Clark
[2006] NZCA 123
Court of Appeal, 12 June 2006: LIBERTY & SECURITY; EVIDENCE

Accused suspected of but not arrested for drink driving should not have been handcuffed prior to and during journey to police station for test but breach of Bill of Rights did not warrant exclusion of evidence where no causative link.

Full text at http://www.commonlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2006/123.html

 

The Queen v Ratahi
[2006] NZCA 121
Court of Appeal, 12 June 2006: LEGAL REPRESENTATION; RIGHT TO SILENCE

No breach of Bill of Rights where it could be inferred that accused had understood police caution, including right to counsel and to silence, and waived right to counsel prior to making inculpatory statements.

Full text at http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2006/121.html

 

SAMOA

Alaiasa v Samoa Broadcasting Corporation
[2006] WSSC 35
Supreme Court, 9 June 2006: EXPRESSION, DEFAMATION

Termination of employment published by employer was incapable of having a defamatory meaning and, in any event, could be justified.

Full text at http://www.paclii.org/ws/cases/WSSC/2006/35.html

 

SOUTH AFRICA

Isaac Metsing Magajane v The Chairperson Northwestern Gambling Board & Ors
CCT 49/05
Constitutional Court, 8 June 2006: PRIVACY

Legislation authorising warrantless searches of unlicensed gambling premises for purpose of obtaining evidence for prosecution struck down.

Full text at http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/magajane.htm

 

TONGA

Lasike v Noble Tu'iha'angana
[2006] TOSC 22; CV 431-2006
Supreme Court, 19 June 2006: POLITICAL PARTICIPATION

Opening of legislature by Princess Regent in absence of King was lawful.

Full text at http://www.paclii.org/to/cases/TOSC/2006/22.html

 

Taione v Pohiva
[2006] TOSC 23; CV 374-2004
Supreme Court, 22 June 2006: ACCESS TO JUSTICE

Indemnity costs awarded to plaintiff in interests of justice given significant public interest of case.

Full text at http://www.paclii.org/to/cases/TOSC/2006/23.html

 

Tau'atevalu v Police
[2006] TOSC 20; AM 008-2005
Supreme Court, 12 June 2006: FAIR HEARING, EQUALITY OF ARMS

Failure to comply with procedural requirements for serving of summons to attend hearing in magistrates’ court, thereby negatively impacting on accused’s ability to prepare his defence, resulted in a miscarriage of justice.

Full text at http://www.paclii.org/to/cases/TOSC/2006/20.html

 

UNITED KINGDOM

Baiai & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Home Department
[2006] EWHC 1454 (Admin)
High Court, 16 June 2006: MARRIAGE; EQUALITY

Refusal to grant illegal immigrant permission to marry did not breach his rights to marry and be treated equally.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2006/1454.html

 

Clayton v Clayton
[2006] EWCA Civ 878
Court of Appeal, 27 June 2006: EXPRESSION; PRIVACY; CHILDREN

Father free to make video diary about his previous abduction of his child but restrained from involving latter father’s exercise of free speech outweighed by child’s right to privacy

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/878.html

 

Countryside Alliance & Ors, R (on the application of) v Attorney General & Anor
[2006] EWCA Civ 817
Court of Appeal, 23 June 2006: PRIVATE & FAMILY LIFE; LIVELIHOOD; ASSEMBLY & ASSOCIATION; PROPERTY

Hunting ban did not breach ECHR; Article 8 ECHR did not embrace respect for community activities or right to a livelihood.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/817.html

 

Hughes v The First Secretary of State & Anor
[2006] EWCA Civ 838
Court of Appeal, 23 June 2006: ROMA; HOME; ENVIRONMENT; EDUCATION

Government’s decision to refuse planning permission for Roma to encroach on environmentally protected land upheld; interests of Roma children’s education properly taken into account in decision process.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/838.html

 

Jones v Ministry of Interior for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia & Ors
[2006] UKHL 26
House of Lords, 14 June 2006: TORTURE; IMPUNITY; ACCESS TO JUSTICE; REMEDIES

Immunity of foreign state and officials in UK civil suit for redress for acts of torture committed outside of UK jurisdiction upheld.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2006/26.html

 

Malaba v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2006] EWCA Civ 820
Court of Appeal, 21 June 2006: REFUGEES; RAPE; TORTURE

Asylum adjudicator erred in law in failing to give sufficient reasons for assessing applicant’s credibility concerning allegations of having suffered rape and torture in DRC.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/820.html

 

Malik v Central Criminal Court & Anor
[2006] EWHC 1539 (Admin)
High Court, 27 June 2006: PUBLIC HEARING; LIBERTY & SECURITY, BAIL

Bail application should have been heard in public; fundamental presumption in favour of open justice.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2006/1539.html

 

Office of Communications & Anor v Floe Telecom Ltd
[2006] EWCA Civ 768
Court of Appeal, 15 June 2006: FAIR HEARING, DELAY

Right under Article 6 ECHR to have adjudication decisions implemented within a reasonable time did not provide basis for tribunal to compel telecommunications regulator to complete investigation within certain time period.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/768.html

 

South Cambridgeshire District Council v Flynn & Ors
[2006] EWHC 1320 (QB)
High Court, 7 June 2006: ROMA; HOME

Roma should comply with eviction order following refusal of planning permission.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2006/1320.html

 

Whitehead, R v
[2006] EWCA Crim 1486
Court of Appeal, 23 June 2006: FAIR HEARING, RIGHT TO SILENCE

Inferences to be drawn from defendant’s failure to give evidence at trial.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2006/1486.html

 

UNITED STATES

 

Beard v Banks & Ors
04-1739
Supreme Court, 28 June 2006: PRISONERS; EXPRESSION

Permissible to restrict prisoners’ access to newspapers, magazines and photographs.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway v White
05-259
Supreme Court, 22 June 2006: EQUALITY, GENDER; EMPLOYMENT

Scope of provisions aimed at preventing retaliation by employer against an employee alleging discrimination not restricted to acts connected to employment or committed at workplace.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

Hamdan v Rumsfeld
05-184
Supreme Court, 29 June 2006: FAIR HEARING; LIBERTY & SECURITY

Guantanamo detainees should not be tried by military commissions established by the Executive in breach of Geneva Conventions but by either civilian courts or court martial.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

 

Hudson v Michigan
04-1360
Supreme Court, 15 June 2006: SEARCH & SEIZURE; EVIDENCE

Violation of ‘knock and announce’ rule does not require suppression of evidence obtained as a result.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

Samson v California
04-9728
Supreme Court, 19 June 2006: SEARCH & SEIZURE; PRISONERS

Suspicionless search of parolees permissible.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

Sanchez-Llammas v Oregon
04-10566
Supreme Court, 28 June 2006: PRISONERS; REMEDIES

Suppression of a defendant’s statement is not an adequate remedy for the violation of the right of an individual to communicate with his consular officers when detained by authorities in a foreign country.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

United States v Gonzalez-Lopez
05-352
Supreme Court, 26 June 2006: FAIR HEARING, LEGAL REPRESENTATION

Trial court’s erroneous deprivation of defendant’s choice of counsel entitled him to reversal of conviction.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

Woodford et al v NGO
05-416
Supreme Court, 22 June 2006: PRISONERS, CONDITIONS; REMEDIES

Prisoners must exhaust all available administrative remedies before challenging prison conditions in federal court.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

May 2006

Last updated 1 June 2006.

 

AUSTRALIA

Harriton v Stephens
[2006] HCA 15
High Court, 9 May 2006: LIFE; DISABILITY; REMEDIES

Whether a life with disabilities is actionable damage and whether life is capable of constituting a legally cognisable injury.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/15.html

 

Waller v James; Waller v Hoolahan
[2006] HCA 16
High Court, 9 May 2006: LIFE; DISABILITY; REMEDIES

Whether a life with disabilities is actionable damage and whether life is capable of constituting a legally cognisable injury.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/16.html

 

HONG KONG

Hui Wui Sang v HKSAR
FACC No. 10/2005
Court of Final Appeal, 23 May 2006: ACCESS TO JUSTICE

Acquitted defendant should be awarded costs.

Full text at http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/en/hkcfa/2006/FACC000010_2005.html

 

IRELAND

Lynch v Honour Judge Moran
[2006] IESC 31
Supreme Court, 23 May 2006: FAIR HEARING, APPEAL, SENTENCE

Estoppel in favour of the prosecution contrary to right to have conviction or sentence reviewed by a higher tribunal.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/2006/S31.html

 

PAPUA NEW GUINEA

Ume v The State
[2006] PGSC 1
Supreme Court, 19 May 2006: DEATH PENALTY

Death penalty for wilful murder not mandatory; application of sentencing principles in considering discretionary application of death penalty.

Full text at http://www.paclii.org/pg/cases/PGSC/2006/1.html

 

SOLOMON ISLANDS

Keke v R
[2006] SBCA 1
Court of Appeal, 25 May 2006: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE; LIBERTY & SECURITY, CONFESSION, ARREST

Confession should not automatically be excluded as a result of initial failure to provide reasons for arrest and detention in breach of constitution.

Full text at http://www.paclii.org/sb/cases/SBCA/2006/1.html

 

SOUTH AFRICA

Matau v Longrops 5 (Pty) Ltd & Ors
LCC 63/06
Land Claims Court, 10 May 2006: RELIGION; PROPERTY

Occupiers of land and members of their family had right to bury their dead on the land if they were resident at time of death even if against the will of the owner.

Full text at http://wwwserver.law.wits.ac.za/lcc/judgment.php?case_id=13245

 

Phumelela Gaming and Leisure Ltd v Gründlingh and Others
CCT 31/ 05
Constitutional Court, 18 May 2006: ACCESS TO JUSTICE; PROPERTY

Failure to raise constitutional issues in lower courts was not a bar to consideration by Constitutional Court; right to property protects right to goodwill; right to freedom of trade is not inconsistent with promotion of lawful competition.

Full text at http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/phumelela.htm

 

UNITED KINGDOM

Ali v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2006] EWCA Civ 484
Court of Appeal, 3 May 2006: REFUGEES; FAIR HEARING, STANDARD OF PROOF; HOME & FAMILY LIFE

Civil standard of proof should apply when determining issues of status relevant to a right of residence
conferred by European law or English domestic law or English domestic law compared to lower standard
applicable in cases where there was a risk of breach of Articles 2 or 3 of the ECHR; Article 8 ECHR not
breached by removal.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/484.html

 

Davis , R v
[2006] EWCA Crim 1155
Court of Appeal, 19 May 2006: FAIR HEARING, EQUALITY OF ARMS

Witness anonymity in trial proceedings justified.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2006/1155.html

 

Desnousse v London Borough of Newham & Ors
[2006] EWCA Civ 547
Court of Appeal, 17 May 2006: HOUSING

No requirement on Housing Authority, having decided that an applicant, though eligible for assistance and in priority need, became homeless intentionally, to enforce repossession through the courts after statutory period of temporary accommodation came to an end.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/547.html

 

DK v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2006] EWCA Civ 682
Court of Appeal, 25 May 2006: REFUGEES; TORTURE, CRUEL, INHUMAN AND DEGRADING TREATMENT

Failure to take into account relevant evidence about situation in Kurdish area of Iraq in consideration of claim under the Refugee Convention and Article 3 ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/682.html

 

Haw, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor
[2006] EWCA Civ 532
Court of Appeal, 8 May 2006: EXPRESSION; ASSEMBLY; STATUTORY INTERPRETATION

Ban on protests near UK Parliament covered ongoing demonstrations.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/532.html

 

NJ v Essex County Council & Anor
[2006] EWCA Civ 545
Court of Appeal, 11 May 2006: FAMILY; FAIR HEARING

Care order did not breach mother’s rights under Articles 6 and 8 ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/545.html

 

Oxfordshire County Council v Oxford City Council & Anor
[2006] UKHL 25
House of Lords, 24 May 2006: PROPERTY

System of prescription by which land could after 20 years of use become subject to recreational rights was not inconsistent with landowner’s property rights.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2006/25.html

 

Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Rutherford & Ors
[2006] UKHL 19
House of Lords, 3 May 2006: EQUALITY; WORK

Removal of benefits of redundancy pay or compensation for unfair dismissal after retirement at 65 did not indirectly discriminate against men.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2006/19.html

 

UNITED STATES

Garcetti & Ors v Ceballos
04/473
Supreme Court, 30 May 2006: EXPRESSION

Public employees making statements pursuant to their official duties not covered by citizens’ free speech protection under the First Amendment.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

Holmes v South Carolina
04/1327
Supreme Court, 1 May 2006: FAIR HEARING, EQUALITY OF ARMS, EVIDENCE

Evidence rule preventing defendant from introducing evidence of third party guilt not justified where prosecution could introduce forensic evidence strongly supporting a guilty verdict.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

Brigham City Utah v Stuart & Ors
05/502
Supreme Court, 22 May 2006: SEARCH & SEIZURE; LIBERTY & SECURITY

Police may enter a home without a warrant where there is an objective reasonable basis for believing that an occupant is seriously injured or imminently threatened with such injury.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html


April 2006

Last updated 2 May 2006.

 

AUSTRALIA

Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v SZFDJ
[2006] FCAFC 53
Federal Court, 28 April 2006: REFUGEES; FAIR HEARING

Claim based on well-founded fear of persecution by reason of membership of a social group (male homosexuals) in Bangladesh denied due process by Tribunal’s failure to refer to one of two sources of country information which distinguished between two sub-groups.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2006/53.html

 

Save the Ridge Inc v Commonwealth
[2006] FCAFC 51
Federal Court, 18 April 2006: ACCESS TO JUSTICE; ENVIRONMENT

Insufficient public interest grounds warranting waiver of costs against unsuccessful party in environmental protection litigation.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2006/51.html

 

State of New South Wales v Amery
[2006] HCA 14
High Court, 13 April 2006: EQUALITY; GENDER; WORK

Subjection of casual teachers to different salary scales did not amount to unlawful discrimination.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/14.html

 

Von Arnim v Honourable Christopher Martin Ellison
[2006] FCAFC 49
High Court, 11 April 2006: EXTRADITION; LIBERTY & SECURITY

No breach of duty of care or false imprisonment as a result of unsuccessful extradition proceedings.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2006/49.html

 

BAHAMAS

Simmons & Anor v R
[2006] UKPC 19
Privy Council, 3 April 2006: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE; DEATH PENALTY

Admission of exculpatory confession statement and failure to give good character direction did not affect fairness of proceedings given overwhelming evidence against accused; mandatory death penalty should not be imposed.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2006/19.html

 

CANADA

Heinz Ltd v Attorney General
2006 SCC 13
Supreme Court, 21 April 2006: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION; PRIVACY

Third party company entitled to object to release of confidential business material following request made under freedom of information legislation.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2006/2006scc13.html

 

R v Rodgers
2006 SCC 15
Supreme Court, 27 April 2006: LIBERTY & SECURITY; SEARCH & SEIZURE

Collection of DNA samples for data bank purposes from designated classes of convicted offenders was reasonable. 

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2006/2006scc15.html

 

Tranchemontagne v Ontario (Director, Disability Support Program)
2006 SCC 14
Supreme Court, 21 April 2006: JURISDICTION; DISABILITY; SOCIAL SECURITY

Social Benefits Tribunal had jurisdiction to consider the Human Rights Code in determining whether claimants were eligible for statutory support.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2006/2006scc14.html

 

JAMAICA

Edwards v The Queen
[2006] UKPC 23
Privy Council, 25 April 2006: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE

Unsafe conviction following inadequate direction on weaknesses of identification evidence.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2006/23.html

 

Williams v The Queen
[2006] UKPC 21
Privy Council, 25 April 2006: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE; LIBERTY & SECURITY; CHILDREN

Confession obtained under duress from 12 year old should not have been admitted.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2006/21.html

 

MAURITIUS

Mohit v DPP
[2006] UKPC 20
Privy Council, 25 April 2006: ACCESS TO JUSTICE

Decision by the Director of Public Prosecutions to discontinue a private prosecution was in principle susceptible to review by the courts .

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2006/20.html

 

TRINIDAD & TOBAGO

Bobb & Anor v Manning
[2006] UKPC 22
Privy Council, 25 April 2006: POLITICAL PARTICIPATION

Unsuccessful challenge to Prime Minister’s decision not to hold elections.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2006/22.html

 

UNITED KINGDOM

A v Iorworth Hoare & Ors v Wandsworth
[2006] EWCA Civ 395
Court of Appeal, 12 April 2006: ACCESS TO JUSTICE; CHILDREN

Limitation period on personal injury claims for sexual abuse committed against school pupils upheld.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/395.html

 

AA & Anor v LK & Anor
[2006] EWCA Civ 401
Court of Appeal, 12 April 2006: REFUGEES

Consideration of asylum seekers’ claims not to be returned to Zimbabwe.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/401.html

 

G v R
[2006] EWCA Crim 821
Court of Appeal, 12 April 2006: PRIVATE & FAMILY LIFE

Subjecting a defendant found guilty of sexual assault to notification requirements for a period of 5 years did not breach his rights under Article 8 of the ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2006/821.html

 

H v R
[2006] EWCA Crim 853
Court of Appeal, 25 April 2006: FAIR HEARING; CHILDREN

Juvenile offender found guilty of rape not denied a fair hearing by virtue of lack of participation in proceedings.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/853.html

 

Kaydanyuk v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2006] EWCA Civ 368
Court of Appeal, 4 April 2006: REFUGEES; LIFE; CRUEL & INHUMAN TREATMENT; PRIVATE & FAMILY LIFE

Insufficient risk of suicide to justify preventing deportation.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/368.html

 

Krasniki v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2006] EWCA Civ 391
Court of Appeal, 10 April 2006: REFUGEES; FAMILY LIFE; SEXUALITY

Asylum seeker who had formed a relationship with another woman pending consideration of claim merited exceptional case status under Article 8 ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/391.html

 

RG ( Ethiopia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2006] EWCA Civ 339
Court of Appeal, 4 April 2006: REFUGEES

Unmarried females in Ethiopia subjected to abuse were particular social group for purposes of Refugee Convention.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/339.html

 

Rogers, R (on the application of ) v Swindon NHS Primary Care Trust
[2006] EWCA Civ 392
Court of Appeal, 12 April 2006: HEALTH; LIFE

Decision of Primary Healthcare Trust to refuse to fund the treatment of patient with Herceptin to combat breast cancer in accordance with a doctor’s recommendation quashed .

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/392.html

 

Tozlukaya, R (on the application of) v
[2006] EWCA Civ 379
Court of Appeal, 11 April 2006: REFUGEES; CRUEL & INHUMAN TREATMENT; MENTAL HEALTH; PRIVATE & FAMILY LIFE; CHILDREN

Claim resisting deportation on mental health grounds and risk of suicide could not succeed under either Article 3 or Article 8 ECHR; arguable that exceptional case for protection under Article 8 where family with children had been continuously resident in UK for more than seven years.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/379.html

 

UNITED STATES

Day v McDonough
04/1524
Supreme Court, 25 April 2006: ACCESS TO JUSTICE, LIMITATION PERIOD; LIBERTY & SECURITY

Court had discretion to correct state’s mistake and dismiss habeas corpus petition as being out of time.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

March 2006

Last updated 1 March 2006.

AUSTRALIA

Antoun v The Queen
[2006] HCA 2
High Court, 8 February 2006: FAIR HEARING, BIAS

Apprehension of bias based on judge’s conduct in dealing with submission of no case to answer and bail application by defence.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/2.html

 

Applicant M164/2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2006] FCAFC 16
Federal Court, 22 February 2006: REFUGEES; FAIR HEARING

Refugee Review Tribunal failed to properly consider claim and whether state protection would be available to asylum seeker on her version of events.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2006/16.html

 

CSR Ltd v Della Maddalena
[2006] HCA 1
High Court, 2 February 2006: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE

Whether court’s expression of preferred expert witnesses as ‘well known to the court’ constituted a breach of procedural fairness.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/1.html

 

Hermanowski v United States of America
[2006] FCAFC 8
Federal Court, 17 February 2006: EXTRADITION, EVIDENCE

Application of extradition treaty in relation to description of facts setting forth reasonable grounds for believing that an offence had been committed and the person sought committed it.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2006/8.html

 

SZCWP v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2006] FCAFC 8
Federal Court, 20 February 2006: REFUGEES; WAR CRIMES, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

Applicant excluded from protection of Refugees Convention on the basis of serious reasons for considering he had committed war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2006/9.html

 

CANADA

Via Rail Canada Inc. v Canadian Transportation Agency
2006 FCA 45
Federal Court of Appeal, 6 February 2006: DISABILITY; EQUALITY

Rail company’s meal distribution policy did not breach disabled person’s statutory mobility rights.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fca/2006/2006fca45.html

 

INDIA

Surinder Singh Shingara Singh v State of Punjab
[2005] INSC 448
Supreme Court, 6 September 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY, BAIL; FAIR HEARING, DELAY

Bail granted to appellant sentenced to life imprisonment having already served over six years in custody pending hearing of appeal against conviction.

Full text at http://www.commonlii.org/in/cases/INSC/2005/448.html

 

JAMAICA

Ebanks v The Queen
[2006] UKPC 6
Privy Council, 16 February 2006: DEATH PENALTY; FAIR HEARING

Accused not denied fair hearing in capital murder trial but should not be subject to mandatory death sentence in light of repeal following R v Watson.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2006/6.html

 

Shabadine Peart v The Queen
[2006] UKPC 5
Privy Council, 14 February 2006: FAIR HEARING; EVIDENCE; LIBERTY & SECURITY

Scope of judicial discretion to admit confession evidence where breach of Judges Rules.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2006/5.html

 

NAMIBIA

The Minister of Health and Social Services v Lisse
[2005] NASC 1
Supreme Court, 23 November 2005: FAIR HEARING

Minister’s refusal to grant license breached doctor’s constitutional right to fair hearing by administrative bodies and officials.

Full text at http://www.saflii.org/na/cases/NASC/2005/1.html

 

Waterberg Big Game Hunting Lodge Otjahewita (Pty) Ltd v The Minister of Environment and Tourism
[2005] NASC 2
Supreme Court, 23 November 2005: FAIR HEARING

Breach of Article 18 following refusal of application to import wild game; incorporation of reasonable or legitimate expectation doctrine into constitutional protection of due process in administrative decision-making.

Full text at http://www.saflii.org/na/cases/NASC/2005/2.html

 

NEW ZEALAND

Thompson v The Queen
[2006] NZSC 3
Supreme Court, 15 February 2006: FAIR HEARING

No miscarriage of justice where jury heard references to victim’s responses to questions from defence in cross examination to accused’s imprisonment for prior offences.

Full text at http://www.justice.govt.nz/judgments

 

 

SOUTH AFRICA

African Christian Democratic Party
CCT 10/06
Constitutional Court, 24 February 2006: POLITICAL PARTICIPATION, ELECTIONS

Political party complied with local electoral legislation which had to be construed according to political rights contained in the Constitution.

Full text at http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/africchrisdemocratic.htm  

 

UNITED KINGDOM

Ariaya v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2006] EWCA Civ 48
Court of Appeal, 8 February 2006: REFUGEES

Perceived draft evaders from Eritrea at insufficient risk of persecution upon return.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/48.html

 

Bailey v Warren
[2006] EWCA Civ 51
Court of Appeal, 7 February 2006: FAIR HEARING

Pre-action compromise in personal injury suit did comply with ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/51.html

 

The Queen v C & K
[2006] EWCA Crim 197
Court of Appeal, 21 February 2006: FAIR HEARING; EQUALITY OF ARMS

Right to cross examine witness absent through fear is not absolute.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2006/197.html

 

Januzi v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors
[2006] UKHL 5
House of Lords, 15 February 2006: REFUGEES

Whether unduly harsh for a claimant to be expected to live in a place of relocation within the country of his nationality is not to be judged by considering whether the quality of life in the place of relocation meets the basic norms of civil, political and socio-economic human rights.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2006/5.html

 

Kearney v Her Majesty’s Advocate
[2006] UKPC D1
Privy Council, 6 February 2006: FAIR HEARING, INDEPENDENCE

Temporary judge of Scottish Court of Sessions sufficiently independent and impartial.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2006/D1.html

 

Khan v Revenue & Customs
[2006] EWCA Civ 89
Court of Appeal, 23 February 2006: FAIR HEARING, LEGAL REPRESENTATION

Although VAT evasion proceedings are ‘criminal’ for the purposes of Article 6 ECHR this does not require application of all of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act safeguards; no breach of Article 6 by lack of legal representation at such hearings.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/89.html

 

Makuwa, R v
[2006] EWCA Crim 175
Court of Appeal, 23 February 2006: REFUGEES; FAIR HEARING, PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

Reversing the burden of proof on a claimant seeking to rely on s 31 of the Immigration and Asylum Act to defend their illegal presence was a justifiable infringement of the presumption of innocence.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2006/175.html

 

Miao v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2006] EWCA Civ 75
Court of Appeal, 16 February 2006: REFUGEES; FAMILY & PRIVATE LIFE; HEALTH

Failed asylum seeker allowed to remain to care for father suffering from chronic depression and post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of having been imprisoned and tortured.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/75.html

 

Wright, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2006] EWCA Civ 67
Court of Appeal, 15 February 2006: LIBERTY & SECURITY; REMEDIES; RETROSPECTIVITY

No enforceable right to compensation for illegal detention occurring prior to coming into force of Human Rights Act; mandatory life sentences breach Article 5(4) ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/67.html

 

UNITED STATES

Gonzales v Centro Espirita & Ors
04/1084
Supreme Court, 21 February 2006: RELIGION

No justification for banning use of hallucinogenic tea in religious ceremony.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

 

 

February 2006

Last updated 1 March 2006.

AUSTRALIA

Antoun v The Queen
[2006] HCA 2
High Court, 8 February 2006: FAIR HEARING, BIAS

Apprehension of bias based on judge’s conduct in dealing with submission of no case to answer and bail application by defence.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/2.html

 

Applicant M164/2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2006] FCAFC 16
Federal Court, 22 February 2006: REFUGEES; FAIR HEARING

Refugee Review Tribunal failed to properly consider claim and whether state protection would be available to asylum seeker on her version of events.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2006/16.html

 

CSR Ltd v Della Maddalena
[2006] HCA 1
High Court, 2 February 2006: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE

Whether court’s expression of preferred expert witnesses as ‘well known to the court’ constituted a breach of procedural fairness.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/1.html

 

Hermanowski v United States of America
[2006] FCAFC 8
Federal Court, 17 February 2006: EXTRADITION, EVIDENCE

Application of extradition treaty in relation to description of facts setting forth reasonable grounds for believing that an offence had been committed and the person sought committed it.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2006/8.html

 

SZCWP v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2006] FCAFC 8
Federal Court, 20 February 2006: REFUGEES; WAR CRIMES, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

Applicant excluded from protection of Refugees Convention on the basis of serious reasons for considering he had committed war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2006/9.html

 

CANADA

Via Rail Canada Inc. v Canadian Transportation Agency
2006 FCA 45
Federal Court of Appeal, 6 February 2006: DISABILITY; EQUALITY

Rail company’s meal distribution policy did not breach disabled person’s statutory mobility rights.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fca/2006/2006fca45.html

 

INDIA

Surinder Singh Shingara Singh v State of Punjab
[2005] INSC 448
Supreme Court, 6 September 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY, BAIL; FAIR HEARING, DELAY

Bail granted to appellant sentenced to life imprisonment having already served over six years in custody pending hearing of appeal against conviction.

Full text at http://www.commonlii.org/in/cases/INSC/2005/448.html

 

JAMAICA

Ebanks v The Queen
[2006] UKPC 6
Privy Council, 16 February 2006: DEATH PENALTY; FAIR HEARING

Accused not denied fair hearing in capital murder trial but should not be subject to mandatory death sentence in light of repeal following R v Watson.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2006/6.html

 

Shabadine Peart v The Queen
[2006] UKPC 5
Privy Council, 14 February 2006: FAIR HEARING; EVIDENCE; LIBERTY & SECURITY

Scope of judicial discretion to admit confession evidence where breach of Judges Rules.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2006/5.html

 

NAMIBIA

The Minister of Health and Social Services v Lisse
[2005] NASC 1
Supreme Court, 23 November 2005: FAIR HEARING

Minister’s refusal to grant license breached doctor’s constitutional right to fair hearing by administrative bodies and officials.

Full text at http://www.saflii.org/na/cases/NASC/2005/1.html

 

Waterberg Big Game Hunting Lodge Otjahewita (Pty) Ltd v The Minister of Environment and Tourism
[2005] NASC 2
Supreme Court, 23 November 2005: FAIR HEARING

Breach of Article 18 following refusal of application to import wild game; incorporation of reasonable or legitimate expectation doctrine into constitutional protection of due process in administrative decision-making.

Full text at http://www.saflii.org/na/cases/NASC/2005/2.html

 

NEW ZEALAND

Thompson v The Queen
[2006] NZSC 3
Supreme Court, 15 February 2006: FAIR HEARING

No miscarriage of justice where jury heard references to victim’s responses to questions from defence in cross examination to accused’s imprisonment for prior offences.

Full text at http://www.justice.govt.nz/judgments

 

 

SOUTH AFRICA

African Christian Democratic Party
CCT 10/06
Constitutional Court, 24 February 2006: POLITICAL PARTICIPATION, ELECTIONS

Political party complied with local electoral legislation which had to be construed according to political rights contained in the Constitution.

Full text at http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/africchrisdemocratic.htm  

 

UNITED KINGDOM

Ariaya v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2006] EWCA Civ 48
Court of Appeal, 8 February 2006: REFUGEES

Perceived draft evaders from Eritrea at insufficient risk of persecution upon return.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/48.html

 

Bailey v Warren
[2006] EWCA Civ 51
Court of Appeal, 7 February 2006: FAIR HEARING

Pre-action compromise in personal injury suit did comply with ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/51.html

 

The Queen v C & K
[2006] EWCA Crim 197
Court of Appeal, 21 February 2006: FAIR HEARING; EQUALITY OF ARMS

Right to cross examine witness absent through fear is not absolute.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2006/197.html

 

Januzi v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors
[2006] UKHL 5
House of Lords, 15 February 2006: REFUGEES

Whether unduly harsh for a claimant to be expected to live in a place of relocation within the country of his nationality is not to be judged by considering whether the quality of life in the place of relocation meets the basic norms of civil, political and socio-economic human rights.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2006/5.html

 

Kearney v Her Majesty’s Advocate
[2006] UKPC D1
Privy Council, 6 February 2006: FAIR HEARING, INDEPENDENCE

Temporary judge of Scottish Court of Sessions sufficiently independent and impartial.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2006/D1.html

 

Khan v Revenue & Customs
[2006] EWCA Civ 89
Court of Appeal, 23 February 2006: FAIR HEARING, LEGAL REPRESENTATION

Although VAT evasion proceedings are ‘criminal’ for the purposes of Article 6 ECHR this does not require application of all of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act safeguards; no breach of Article 6 by lack of legal representation at such hearings.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/89.html

 

Makuwa, R v
[2006] EWCA Crim 175
Court of Appeal, 23 February 2006: REFUGEES; FAIR HEARING, PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

Reversing the burden of proof on a claimant seeking to rely on s 31 of the Immigration and Asylum Act to defend their illegal presence was a justifiable infringement of the presumption of innocence.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2006/175.html

 

Miao v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2006] EWCA Civ 75
Court of Appeal, 16 February 2006: REFUGEES; FAMILY & PRIVATE LIFE; HEALTH

Failed asylum seeker allowed to remain to care for father suffering from chronic depression and post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of having been imprisoned and tortured.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/75.html

 

Wright, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2006] EWCA Civ 67
Court of Appeal, 15 February 2006: LIBERTY & SECURITY; REMEDIES; RETROSPECTIVITY

No enforceable right to compensation for illegal detention occurring prior to coming into force of Human Rights Act; mandatory life sentences breach Article 5(4) ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/67.html

 

UNITED STATES

Gonzales v Centro Espirita & Ors
04/1084
Supreme Court, 21 February 2006: RELIGION

No justification for banning use of hallucinogenic tea in religious ceremony.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

 

 

January 2006

Last updated 1 February 2006.

CANADA

Human Rights Commission v. Canadian Airlines International Ltd
2006 SCC 1
Supreme Court, 26 January 2006: EQUALITY; WORK

Flight attendants, pilots and mechanics of airline company are in same establishment for purposes of wage comparisons in relation to pay discrimination claim.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2006/2006scc1.html

 

Minister of Citizenship and Immigration v. Thanabalasingham
2006 FCA 14
Federal Court of Appeal, 12 January 2006: REFUGEES; JUDICIAL REVIEW; TORTURE

Court, if satisfied that an applicant for judicial review of a deportation decision has lied, or is otherwise guilty of misconduct, may but is not obliged to dismiss the application without proceeding to determine the merits or, even though having found reviewable error, decline to grant relief; cons equences that might befall the applicant can be taken into account by reviewing court.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fca/2006/2006fca14.html

 

JAMAICA

Grant v The State
[2006] UKPC 2
Privy Council, 16 January 2006: FAIR HEARING, EQUALITY OF ARMS

Provision permitting the admission of an unsworn statement made out of court, where the statutory conditions are met and subject to the exercise of any relevant judicial discretion when, but for the section, the statement would have been inadmissible as hearsay, upheld; provision not applied where potentially significant evidence was never placed before the jury.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2006/2.html

 

TRINIDAD & TOBAGO

State v Boyce
[2006] UKPC 1
Privy Council, 11 January 2006: FAIR HEARING, DOUBLE JEOPARDY

Principle of double jeopardy not infringed by prosecution having the right to appeal against an acquittal.

Full text at   http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2006/1.html

 

UNITED KINGDOM

A & Ors, R v
[2006] EWCA Crim 4
Court of Appeal, 13 January 2006 : FAIR HEARING, PUBLIC TRIAL

In camera hearing of terrorism trial required where significant threat to national security and administration of justice.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2006/4.html

 

AD v OH (a child) & Anor
[2006] EWCA Civ 1
Court of Appeal, 13 January 2006: APPLICATION; PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE; REMEDIES

Human Rights Act could not be applied where damage as a result of alleged negligence of care authorities occurred prior to coming into force; human rights provisions could provide a remedy for harmful actions of local authorities in absence of common law provision.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/1.html

 

B, R (on the application of) v SS (Responsible Medical Officer) & Ors
[2006] EWCA Civ 28
Court of Appeal, 26 January 2006: MENTAL HEALTH; CRUEL & DEGRADING TREATMENT; PRIVATE & FAMILY LIFE; EQUALITY

Compulsory treatment of detained mental health patient using anti-psychotic medication upheld.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/28.html

 

Collier v Williams
[2006] EWCA Civ 20
Court of Appeal, 25 January 2006: FAIR HEARING

Refusal to vary or revoke previous civil proceedings order without oral hearing did not breach Article 6 ECHR where decision could be appealed.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/20.html

 

Galloway v Telegraph Group
[2006] EWCA Civ 17
Court of Appeal, 25 January 2006: FREE EXPRESSION; PRIVATE & FAMILY LIFE

Reynolds qualified privilege unsuccessfully argued by newspaper in defence to libel action.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/17.html

 

Gillies v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
[2006] UKHL 2
House of Lords, 26 January 2006: FAIR HEARING, BIAS

Claim that there was a reasonable apprehension that the medical member of a disability appeal tribunal was biased not upheld.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2006/2.html

 

Morrison & Anor v AWG Group Ltd & Anor
[2006] EWCA Civ 6
Court of Appeal, 20 January 2006: FAIR HEARING, BIAS

Judge should have recused himself from hearing case where he had a long personal relationship with one of the litigants.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/6.html

 

Revenue & Customs v ID Card Services Ireland Ltd
[2006] EWCA Civ 29
Court of Appeal, 27 January 2006: INTERPRETATION

Comparison of interpreting domestic legislation to be in conformity with the ECHR as opposed to EU law.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/29.html

 

Serco Ltd v Lawson
[2006] UKHL 3
House of Lords, 26 January 2006: JURISDICTION; WORK

Territorial scope of UK legislation giving ex patriate employees the right not to be unfairly dismissed.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2006/3.html

 

Staines , R v
[2006] EWCA Crim 15
Court of Appeal, 26 January 2006: MENTAL HEALTH; CRUEL, INHUMAN & DEGRADING TREATMENT; SENTENCING

Discretionary life sentence of mentally ill defendant upheld.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2006/15.html

 

UNITED STATES

 

Ayotte v Planned Parenthood of Northern New England & Ors
04-1144
Supreme Court, 18 January 2006: WOMEN; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; LIFE

Interpretation of statute regulating access to abortion in medical emergencies.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

Brown & Anor v Sanders
04-980
Supreme Court, 11 January 2006: DEATH PENALTY

Criteria for implementing the death penalty following conviction for first degree murder.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

Evans v Chavis
04-721
Supreme Court, 10 January 2006: LIBERTY & SECURITY; REMEDIES

Consideration of whether habeas petition following conviction under anti-terrorism legislation was filed within a ‘reasonable time’.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

Rice & Ors v Collins
04-52
Supreme Court, 18 January 2006: FAIR HEARING; EQUALITY

Prosecutor’s striking of juror on alleged race grounds upheld.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

United States v Georgia & Ors
04-1203
Supreme Court, 10 January 2006: PRISONERS; DISABILITY; REMEDIES

Authorities could not automatically plead sovereign state immunity in claim brought by paraplegic prisoner concerning prison conditions.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

Will & Ors v Hallock & Ors
04-1332
Supreme Court, 18 January 2006: ACCESS TO JUSTICE; SEARCH & SEIZURE; PROPERTY

Dismissal of initial action against customs agents on basis of state sovereign immunity in claim for illegal search and seizure could not be used to support complete bar on future claims.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

December 2005

 

Last updated 6 January 2006.

 

AUSTRALIA

Applicant VEAL of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[2005] HCA 72
High Court, 6 December 2005: REFUGEES; FAIR HEARING

Tribunal should have informed asylum seeker of unsolicited letter and its contents received by the Department of Immigration and reviewed by the Tribunal which made allegations against him.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2005/72.html

 

MWJ v The Queen
[2005] HCA 74
High Court, 7 December 2005: FAIR HEARING

Court erred in not ensuring that supposed inconsistencies between the evidence of the complainant and her mother were not put to the complainant in cross-examination but insufficiently serious to warrant overturning convictions.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2005/74.html

 

NAIS v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[2005] HCA 77
High Court, 14 December 2005: REFUGEES; FAIR HEARING, DELAY

Substantial delay between first Tribunal hearing and Tribunal decision resulted in denial of procedural fairness.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2005/77.html

 

CANADA

May v Ferndale Institution
2005 SCC 82
Supreme Court, 22 December 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; REMEDIES

Habeas corpus granted following involuntary transfer of prisoners from minimum security to medium security detention using computer reclassification; prisoners able to challenge their detention either by way of habeas corpus or judicial review in appropriate forum.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc82.html

 

R v Henry
2005 SCC 76
Supreme Court, 15 December 2005: PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

Protection against self-incrimination is not available to an accused who chooses to testify at his retrial on the same indictment. 

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc76.html

 

R v Spence
2005 SCC 71
Supreme Court, 2 December 2005: FAIR HEARING; BIAS

Accused charged with interracial crime not automatically entitled to challenge potential jurors for bias on the basis of race.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc71.html

 

R v Wiles
2005 SCC 84
Supreme Court, 22 December 2005: CRUEL PUNISHMENT

Mandatory weapons prohibition following conviction for possession of illegal drugs did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment.

Full text at  http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc84.html 

 

IRELAND

Dundon v Governor of Cloverhill Prison
[2005] IESC 83
Supreme Court, 19 December 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; EXTRADITION

Person detained under European Arrest Warrant pending extradition is not automatically entitled to release following expiry of unextended sixty day time limit.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/2005/S83.html

 

Howlin v Hon Mr Justice Morris
[2005] IESC 85
Supreme Court, 20 December 2005: PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE

Scope of parliamentary privilege in relation to discovery of documents required for criminal investigation.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/2005/S85.html

 

KIRIBATI

Republic v Tio
[2005] KIHC 56
High Court, 14 November 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY

Detention without charge unacceptable.

Full text at http://www.paclii.org/ki/cases/KIHC/2005/56.html

 

MAURITIUS

Hurnam v The State
[2005] UKPC 49
Privy Council, 15 December 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY, BAIL

Seriousness of offence not conclusive in determining bail application.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/49.html

 

NEW ZEALAND

Chow v Canterbury District Law Society
[2005] CA 85/05
Court of Appeal, 8 December 2005: FAIR HEARING

Fair hearing requirements of Bill of Rights probably apply to Law Society Complaints Committee.

Full text at http://www.brookers.co.nz/legal/judgments/

 

R v Fatu
[2005] CA454/05
Court of Appeal, 15 December 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY, BAIL

Bill of Rights requires close examination of the justification for setting unusual bail terms.

Full text at http://www.brookers.co.nz/legal/judgments/

 

Mist v R
[2005] NZSC 77
Supreme Court, 1 December 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; SENTENCING

Accused must have reached qualifying age for sentence of preventive detention at time of commission of offence.

Full text at http://www.justice.govt.nz/judgments/

 

SOUTH AFRICA

Minister of Home Affairs & Anor v Fourie & Anor; Lesbian and Gay Equality Project & Ors v Minister of Home Affairs & Ors
CCT 60/04; 10/05
Constitutional Court, 1 December 2005: EQUALITY, SEXUALITY; MARRIAGE

Same sex couples entitled to marry.

Full text at http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/gaylesb.htm

 

Veldman v DPP
CCT 19/ 05
Constitutional Court, 5 December 2005: FAIR HEARING; SENTENCING; RETROSPECTIVITY

Retrospective legislation increasing maximum penal jurisdiction of the trial court could not be applied to raise accused’s sentence after he had pleaded; a procedural law may not apply retrospectively if the application would adversely affect an applicant’s substantive rights.

Full text at http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/veldman.htm

 

TRINIDAD & TOBAGO

Ramdhanie and Ors v The State
[2005] UKPC 47
Privy Council, 15 December 2005: FAIR HEARING

Unacceptable tenor and content of prosecuting counsel's speech capable of having a significant impact on the jury so as to result in material irregularity.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/47.html

 

UNITED KINGDOM

A & Ors v Home Secretary
[2005] UKHL 71
House of Lords, 8 December 2005: TORTURE; FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE

Special Immigration Appeals Commission should notreceive evidence which has or may have been procured by torture inflicted, in order to obtain evidence, by officials of a foreign state even without the complicity of the British authorities.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/71.html

 

A ( Iraq) v Home Secretary
[2005] EWCA Civ 1438
Court of Appeal, 1 December 2005: REFUGEES; TORTURE

Mandatory for refugee claims adjudicator to consider whether asylum seeker should be excluded from refugee status due to participation in acts of torture.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1438.html

 

Al-Skeini & Ors, R (on the application of) v Defence Secretary
[2005] EWCA Civ 1609
Court of Appeal, 21 December 2005: JURISDICTION; LIFE; TORTURE

British soldiers subject to jurisdiction of ECHR and Human Rights Act in relation to alleged human rights abuses.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1609.html

 

Amare v Home Secretary
[2005] EWCA Civ 1600
Court of Appeal, 20 December 2005: REFUGEES; SEXUALITY

Consideration of refugee claim based on alleged persecution on grounds of homosexuality; aim of Refugee Convention is not to safeguard or protect potentially affected persons from having to live in regimes where pluralist liberal values are less respected, even much less respected, than they are in other countries.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1600.html

 

AN, R (on the application of) & Anor v Home Secretary & Ors
[2005] EWCA Civ 1605
High Court, 21 December 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; MENTAL HEALTH; STANDARD OF PROOF

Tribunal did not fundamentally err in applying the standard of proof as balance of probabilities in deciding not to discharge patient being held under Mental Health Act.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1605.html  

 

AW, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Croydon
[2005] EWHC 2950 (QB)
High Court, 16 December 2005: ASYLUM; LIFE; CRUEL TREATMENT

Duties of local authorities to support failed asylum seekers.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2005/2950.html

 

Davidson v Scottish Ministers
[2005] UKHL 74
House of Lords, 15 December 2005: JURISDICTION; PRISONERS; CRUEL & DEGRADING TREATMENT

Courts can compel authorities to transfer prisoner from degrading conditions.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/74.html

 

Dundee City Council v GK & Anor
[2005] ScotCS CSIH_90
Scottish Court of Session, 22 December 2005: CHILDREN; FAMILY; FAIR HEARING

Child protection legislation which failed to provide a mechanism for parental contact and other related orders did not breach either the parent’s rights or that of the child under Arts 8 and 6 of the ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/2005/CSIH_90.html

 

GH ( Afghanistan) v Home Secretary
[2005] EWCA Civ 1603
Court of Appeal, 20 December 2005: REFUGEES; LIFE; CRUEL & INHUMAN TREATMENT

Asylum seeker could be permitted to remain where prevailing conditions in home country were so bad as to potentially threaten Art 3 ECHR rights of claimant and family.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1603.html

 

Grovit v De Nederlandische Bank
[2005] EWHC 2944 (QB)
High Court, 20 December 2005: STATE IMMUNITY; FAIR HEARING

Central Bank of foreign country could invoke state immunity in defence to  libel action.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2005/2944.html

 

Hammond, R (on the application of) v Home Secretary
[2005] UKHL 69
House of Lords, 1 December 2005: SENTENCING; FAIR HEARING

Determination of minimum term sentence for murder without possibility of oral hearing at first instance breached Art 6 of the ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/69.html

 

Henry v BBC
[2005] EWHC 2787 (QB)
High Court, 2 December 2005: EXPRESSION; QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE

Consideration of defence of qualified privilege in libel action.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2005/2787.html

 

R v Holding
[2005] EWCA Crim 3185
Court of Appeal, 1 December 2005: POLITICAL PARTICIPATION

Convictions for incurring unauthorised election expenses infringed the right to free expression under Art 10 ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2005/3185.html

 

McKie & Ors v Macrae & Ors
[2005] ScotCS CSOH_175
Scottish Court of Session, 23 December 2005: FAIR HEARING; DELAY

Civil claim for damages dismissed following inordinate delay of nearly 20 years in pursuing road traffic accident claim.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/2005/CSOH_175.html

 

R v Xhabri
[2005] EWCA Crim 3135
Court of Appeal, 7 December 2005: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE, EQUALITY OF ARMS

Court’s ability to adduce in evidence a hearsay statement by a witness who was not available for cross-examination did not breach Art 6 ECHR where judicial discretion is not restricted to the admission of such a statement; no breach of equality of arms where hearsay provisions apply equally to prosecution and defence; equality of arms does not give a defendant an absolute right to examine every witness whose testimony is adduced against him.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2005/3135.html

 

 

November 2005

Last updated 1 December 2005.

 

AUSTRALIA

 

Mallard v The Queen
[2005] HCA 68
High Court, 15 November 2005: FAIR HEARING, EQUALITY OF ARMS

Retrial ordered where non-disclosure of exculpatory evidence by prosecution denied appellant a fair trial or fair chance of acquittal.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2005/68.html

 

WAKK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 225
Federal Court, 1 November 2005: REFUGEES; FAIR HEARING

Misapprehension of evidence by tribunal did not result in adverse credibility findings serious enough to result in denial of due process.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2005/225.html

 

CANADA

Merk v International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, Local 771
2005 SCC 70
Supreme Court, 24 November 2005: WORK

Unlawful dismissal of employee for whistleblowing about financial abuse in trade union; ‘lawful authority’ can include individuals within the employer organisation who exercise lawful authority over the employee(s) complained about as well as the police and other agencies.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc70.html

 

Mikisew Cree First Nation v Canada (Minister of Canadian Heritage)
2005 SCC 69
Supreme Court, 24 November 2005: INDIGENOUS PEOPLE; NATIVE TITLE

Breach of duty of consultation with indigenous people prior to construction of road though hunting grounds.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc69.html

 

Montreal (City) v 2952-1366 Québec Inc.
2005 SCC 62
Supreme Court, 3 November 2005: EXPRESSION

Justified infringement of free expression to combat excessive noise pollution produced by loudspeakers amplifying sounds from club to outside.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc62.html

 

R v Pires; R v Lising
2005 SCC 66
Supreme Court, 17 November 2005: FAIR HEARING, EQUALITY OF ARMS; PRIVATE LIFE

Permissible to deny accused leave to cross examine police officer on admissibility of wire-tap interception evidence.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc66.html

 

JAMAICA

Smith v The Queen
[2005] UKPC 43
Privy Council, 14 November 2005: DEATH PENALTY

Accused not guilty of capital murder offence.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/43.html

 

NEW ZEALAND

PF Sugrue Ltd v The Attorney General
[2005] UKPC 44
Privy Council, 14 November 2005: PRIVATE LIFE, SEARCH & SEIZURE

Seizure of helicopter used in unlawful animal hunting deemed to be reasonable.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/44.html

 

Warwick Henderson Gallery Ltd v Weston
CA80/04
Court of Appeal, 14 November 2005: WORK

Entitlement to just and favourable conditions of work, as enshrined in Art 23 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, enabled employee to enforce employment agreement that did not comply with legislation.

Full text at http://www.justice.govt.nz/judgments/

 

SOLOMON ISLANDS

R v Solidia
[2005] SBMC 5
Principal Magistrates Court, 20 October 2005: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE

Consideration of whether statement made whilst in police custody was done so voluntarily.

Full text at http://www.paclii.org/sb/cases/SBMC/2005/5.html

 

R v Wagena
[2005] SBMC 6
Principal Magistrates Court, 20 October 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY, BAIL

Bail refused where high possibility of repetition of the offence and interference with a significant witness.

Full text at http://www.paclii.org/sb/cases/SBMC/2005/6.html

 

SOUTH AFRICA

Omar v Government of RSA & Ors
CCT 47/04
Constitutional Court, 7 November 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; WOMEN; ACCESS TO JUSTICE

Interim protection order issued under domestic violence legislation did not constitute arbitrary deprivation of freedom nor breach right to access the courts; legislation justified as serving an important social and legal purpose in addressing the scourge of domestic violence and obligations under the Constitution and international law to combat domestic violence.

Full text at http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/omar.htm

 

TONGA

R v Vola
[2005] TOSC 31
Supreme Court, 10 November 2005: DEATH PENALTY

Consideration of comparative jurisprudence on the death penalty in rejecting it in favour of life imprisonment for a particular offence.

Full text at http://www.paclii.org/to/cases/TOSC/2005/31.html

 

TRINIDAD & TOBAGO

Ali v The State
[2005] UKPC 41
Privy Council, 2 November 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY, SENTENCING; APPEALS

Consideration of how appellate courts should determine the date from which an unsuccessful appellant's sentence should run.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/41.html

 

UNITED KINGDOM

Abdi v Home Secretary
[2005] EWCA Civ 1363
Court of Appeal, 22 November 2005: REFUGEES; PRIVATE & FAMILY LIFE

Application of “Third Country Family Links” Policy leading to deportation of failed asylum seekers did not breach Article 8 of the ECHR in absence of exceptional circumstances barring removal; consideration of legitimate expectation principle.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1363.html

 

Adam, R (on the application of) v Home Secretary
[2005] UKHL 66
House of Lords, 3 November 2005: LIFE; CRUEL, INHUMAN & DEGRADING TREATMENT; HOUSING; HEALTH; REFUGEES

State under a positive obligation to provide destitute asylum seekers with support to prevent them suffering inhuman and degrading treatment.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/UKHL_2005_66.html

 

Ali v Hussain
[2005] EWCA Civ 1404
Court of Appeal, 22 November 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; WOMEN; CHILDREN; FAMILY LIFE

Application of domestic violence guidelines in child contact proceedings.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1404.html

 

Al-Khawaja v R
[2005] EWCA Crim 2697
Court of Appeal, 3 November 2005: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE

Admission of a written statement made by the complainant in a charge of indecent assault, who subsequently died, did not breach defendant's fair trial rights.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2005/2697.html

 

Culnane v Morris & Anor
[2005] EWHC 2438 (QB)
High Court, 8 November 2005: EXPRESSION, DEFAMATION, QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE; POLITICAL PARTICIPATION

< Defence of qualified privilege available to parliamentary candidates under s 10 of the Defamation Act interpreted to be compatible with Articles 6 and 10 of the ECHR to the effect that a candidate cannot claim a special privilege by virtue only of publishing words that are "material to a question in issue in the election"; candidates still able to establish a defence of qualified privilege if the ingredients recognised at common law are present; Act does not specify that a candidate should be confined to the defences of fair comment and justification.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2005/2438.html

 

Francis v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
[2005] EWCA Civ 1303
Court of Appeal, 10 November 2005: SOCIAL SECURITY; EQUALITY

New mother unfairly denied social security benefit; claim could be grounded on right to non-discrimination under Art 14 of the ECHR even where claimant does not qualify for benefit based on the literal wording of the regulations governing entitlement.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1303.html

 

Harb v King Fahd Bin Abdul Aziz
[2005] EWCA Civ 1324
Court of Appeal, 9 November 2005: FAIR HEARING; PRIVATE & FAMILY LIFE

Neither Art 6 nor Art 8 of the ECHR creates substantive financial rights in maintenance claim against former spouse.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1324.html

 

Kent County Council v G & Ors
[2005] UKHL 68
House of Lords, 24 November 2005: CHILDREN; FAMILY LIFE

Refusal of court to direct that mother should undergo therapeutic assessment at hospital in order to prevent child being taken into care did not breach Article 8 of the ECHR. Article 8 neither placed local authority under a positive obligation to provide such treatment nor created a right to be made a better parent at public expense.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/68.html

 

R v Navabi & Ors
[2005] EWCA Crim 2865
Court of Appeal, 11 November 2005: REFUGEES; FAIR HEARING, PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

Reversal of burden of proof on asylum claimants did not breach presumption of innocence; standard of proof confirmed as balance of probabilities.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2005/2865.html

 

Rodriguez-Torres, R (on the application of) v Home Secretary
[2005] EWCA Civ 1328
Court of Appeal, 10 November 2005: REFUGEES; HEALTH; CRUEL, INHUMAN & DEGRADING TREATMENT; PRIVATE & FAMILY LIFE

Likely impact on asylum seeker’s physical or mental health on removing him back to home country would not be so severe so as to constitute breaches of Articles 3 and 8 of the ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1328.html

 

Sinclair Investments Ltd, R (on the application) v The Lands Tribunal
[2005] EWCA Civ 1305
Court of Appeal, 8 November 2005: PROPERTY; JUDICIAL REVIEW

Property rights could not be equated with fundamental rights (as in asylum cases) as a basis for justifying a right to judicial review of a Lands Tribunal decision.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1305.html

 

ZT v Home Secretary
[2005] EWCA Civ 1421
Court of Appeal, 24 November 2005: REFUGEES; HEALTH; LIFE; CRUEL, INHUMAN AND DEGRADING TREATMENT

No basis under Article 3 or 8 to overturn decision to deport failed asylum seeker terminally ill with AIDS back to Zimbabwe.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1421.html

 

UNITED STATES

Schaffer et al v Weast
04-698
Supreme Court, 14 November 2005: DISABILITY; EDUCATION; FAIR HEARING, BURDEN OF PROOF

Burden of proof on those seeking to challenge an individualised education programme for disabled pupils.

Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html

 

October 2005

Last updated 1 November 2005.

 

AUSTRALIA

Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v SZEBA
[2005] FCAFC 216
Federal Court, 7 October 2005: REFUGEES; FAIR HEARING

Failure of Tribunal member to put a medical certificate to the applicant for comment in support of his claim for physical attack for political reason whilst resulting in a denial of procedural fairness did not affect the outcome of the decision to deny refugee status.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2005/216.html


Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v X
[2005] FCAFC 217
Federal Court, 13 October 2005: PRIVACY; ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE; HEALTH

Order forbidding publication of name of respondent infected with HIV granted in interests of administration of justice, even though already in public domain, as would inflict further harm combined with a real risk that publication would dissuade other persons seeking to challenge the legality of administrative decisions linked with a disease carrying a public stigma.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2005/217.html

 

Stevens v The Queen
[2005] HCA 65
High Court, 21 October 2005: FAIR HEARING

Substantial miscarriage of justice occurred as a result of trial judge's failure to give directions on accident to a charge of murder in absence of possibility of manslaughter conviction.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2005/65.html

 

BAHAMAS

Merson v Cartwright & Anor
[2005] UKPC 38
Privy Council, 13 October 2005: REMEDIES

Damages by way of constitutional redress may be compensatory but should always be vindicatory and, accordingly, may, in an appropriate case, exceed a purely compensatory amount with the aim not of punishing the executive but vindicating the rights of the victim; award at discretion of judge - in some cases a suitable declaration may suffice whilst in other cases an award of damages, including substantial damages, may be necessary.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/38.html

 

CANADA

Hilewitz v Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration); De Jong v Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration)
2005 SCC 57
Supreme Court, 21 October 2005: DISABILITY; IMMIGRATION

Applicants’ financial resources should be considered when determining if the admission of disabled children into the country might reasonably be expected to cause excessive demands on social services.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc57.html

 

TRINIDAD & TOBAGO

Panday v Gordon
[2005] UKPC 36
Privy Council, 5 October 2005: EXPRESSION, DEFAMATION

Application of defamation test in relation to televised and widely reported statement made by politician accusing businessman of racism.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/36.html

 

UNITED KINGDOM

A v Hoare
[2005] EWHC 2161 (QB)
High Court, 14 October 2005: FAIR HEARING, ACCESS TO JUSTICE

Application of European Court of Human Rights decision in Stubbings in holding that six year limitation period with no possibility of extension in relation to cases of sexual abuse did not deny the victim access to justice.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2005/2161.html


Campbell v MGN Limited
[2005] UKHL 61
House of Lords, 20 October 2005: PRIVACY; EXPRESSION; REMEDIES

Liability to pay a large sum by way of costs amounted to insufficient threat to freedom of expression.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/61.html

 

GH v Home Secretary
[2005] EWCA Civ 1182
Court of Appeal, 12 October 2005: REFUGEES; JURISDICTION

Doubtful whether Immigration Appellate Authority had jurisdiction to take into account what may happen in the course of the immigrant being removed and travelling to his safe home; route of return or destination may raise issues in respect of an asylum claim, albeit a person who has a safe home territory to which he cannot for the time being safely obtain access cannot be described as having a well founded fear of persecution and is not a refugee.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1182.html

 

H amid & Ors v Home Secretary
[2005] EWCA Civ 1219
Court of Appeal, 25 October 2005: REFUGEES

No general principle or presumption that persecution by or on behalf of the state is incompatible with acceptable internal relocation; internal relocation as an aspect of an asylum claim not dependent on applicant demonstrating that he would receive protection at least equal to the basic norms of civil, political and socio-economic human rights.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1219.html

 

Jackson & Ors v Attorney General
[2005] UKHL 56
House of Lords, 13 October 2005: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Ban on hunting legislation did not breach Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949; interpretation of the scope of the Parliament Acts.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/56.html

 

Langley & Ors v Liverpool City Council
[2005] EWCA Civ 1173
Court of Appeal, 11 October 2005: FAMILY LIFE

Improper implementation of procedures under child protection legislation resulting in taking of child into emergency protection breached family’s Article 8 ECHR rights.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1173.html

 

MH v Health Secretary
[2005] UKHL 60
House of Lords, 20 October 2005: MENTAL HEALTH; LIBERTY & SECURITY; ACCESS TO JUSTICE

Mental health legislation requiring detention of patients complied with Article 5(4) ECHR; no requirement for judicial review of every case where patient is unable to make her own application challenging detention.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/60.html

 

Munjaz, R (on the application of) v Ashworth Hospital Authority
[2005] UKHL 58
House of Lords, 13 October 2005: MENTAL HEALTH; LIBERTY & SECURITY; INHUMAN & DEGRADING TREATMENT; PRIVATE & FAMILY LIFE

Policy governing the seclusion of patients detained at a mental hospital contained sufficient safeguards to avoid breaching the ECHR; seclusion, improperly used, may violate a patient's Article 8 right in a serious and damaging way and may found a claim for relief.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/58.html

 

Quark Fishing Ltd, R (on the application of) v Foreign Secretary
[2005] UKHL 57
House of Lords, 13 October 2005: PROPERTY; JURISDICTION

Denial of a fishing licence can amount to deprivation of a possession within the meaning of Article 1 Optional Protocol 1 ECHR; application of ECHR did not extend to dependent territory in absence of state’s acceptance of territorial application under Article 4 of the Optional Protocol 1.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/57.html

 

Westminster City Council & Anor v Morris
[2005] EWCA Civ 1184
Court of Appeal, 14 October 2005: HOUSING; NATIONALITY; EQUALITY

Precluding a British parent from establishing a priority need for housing assistance where the claim is based on a resident dependent child who is ineligible for citizenship amounted to unlawful discrimination in relation to their right to private and family life.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1184.html

 

Wyatt & Anor v Portsmouth Hospital NHS & Anor
[2005] EWCA Civ 118
Court of Appeal, 12 October 2005: LIFE; CHILDREN; HEALTH

Consideration of whether judge had acted in best interests of seriously ill child in relation to her future medical treatment.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1181.html

 

September 2005

Last updated 3 October 2005.

 

AUSTRALIA

APLA Limited v Legal Services Commissioner (NSW)
[2005] HCA 44
High Court, 1 September 2005: INFORMATION; ACCESS TO JUSTICE

Regulations restricting advertising of services offered by legal profession did not breach public’s implied freedom of information about government or political matters.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2005/44.html

 

Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd
[2005] HCA 52
High Court, 27 September 2005: EXPRESSION, DEFAMATION

Newspaper article linking destruction of a person’s house to the existence of a controversial plan to redevelop the site capable of bearing defamatory meaning.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2005/52.html

 

Mule v The Queen
[2005] HCA 49
High Court, 8 September 2005: FAIR HEARING, RIGHT TO SILENCE, EVIDENCE

Permissible for judge to direct jury that exculpatory statements made by defendant in videotaped police interview admitted in evidence were not supported by evidence on oath and did not have the same weight as admissions; summing-up did not undermine the defendant's right to remain silent at trial.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2005/49.html

 

Ruddock v Taylor
[2005] HCA 48
High Court, 8 September 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; IMMIGRATION

Unlawful cancellation of non-national’s visa resulting in detention under immigration legislation did not support claim of false imprisonment where authorities had acted in good faith and on basis of reasonable suspicion.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2005/48.html

 

CANADA

British Columbia v Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd
2005 SCC 49
Supreme Court, September 2005: EXTRA TERRITORIALITY; INDEPENDENCE OF JUDICIARY; HEALTH

Legislation authorising an action by a provincial government against a manufacturer of tobacco products for the recovery of health care expenditures incurred in treating individuals exposed to them was not unconstitutional by reason of extra‑territoriality where there was a meaningful link to the province based on strong relationships among the enacting territory, the subject matter of the law and the persons made subject to it; shifting of onuses of proof in respect of some of the elements of an aggregate claim or limiting the compellability of certain information  did not breach judicial independence which can tolerate and abide unconventional rules of civil procedure and evidence.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc49.html

 

Genex Communications Inc. v Canada (Attorney General)
2005 FCA 283
Federal Court of Appeal, 1 September 2005: EXPRESSION; FAIR HEARING

Refusal to renew broadcasting licence of commercial radio station did not breach due process or rules of natural justice.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fca/2005/2005fca283.html

 

Zazai v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
2005 FCA 303
Federal Court of Appeal, 20 September 2005: CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

Definition of ‘crime against humanity’ contained in statute included offences of complicity.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fca/2005/2005fca303.html

 

INDIA

Surinder Singh Shingara Singh v State of Punjab
[2005] INSC 448; Appeal (crl.) 1154 of 2005
Supreme Court, 6 September 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; BAIL; FAIR HEARING, DELAY, APPEAL

Bail granted to detainee appealing against conviction after spending more than four years in prison pending a hearing; appellant should normally be granted bail where courts are not in a position to hear appeal against conviction and sentence within reasonable period.

Full text at http://www.commonlii.org/in/cases/INSC/2005/448.html

 

NEW ZEALAND

Child Poverty Action Group v Attorney General
[2005] NZHRRT 28
Human Rights Review Tribunal, 15 September 2005: ACCESS TO JUSTICE, STANDING, EQUALITY; STANDARD OF LIVING

NGO could bring claim in public interest to human rights tribunal claiming that Child Tax Credit provisions discriminated against thousands of poor families; ‘complainant’ should not be given restricted meaning.

Full text at http://www.worldlii.org/nz/cases/NZHRRT/2005/28.html

 

SOUTH AFRICA

Hlaneki & Ors v Commission on Restitution of Land Rights & Ors
LCC43/02
Land Claims Court, 9 September 2005: INDIGENOUS PEOPLE; LAND

Claim by indigenous people for restitution of land dealt with improperly by authorities.

Full text at http://wwwserver.law.wits.ac.za/lcc/


Minister of Health & Anor v New Clicks SA (Pty) Ltd & Ors
CCT 59/ 04
Constitutional Court, 30 September 2005: HEALTH

Scheme designed to make medicines available at affordable prices upheld.

Full text at http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/home.htm

 

UNITED KINGDOM

Friend & Ors v The Lord Advocate
[2005] ScotCS CSIH_69
Scottish Court of Session, 27 September 2005: PRIVATE & FAMILY LIFE; THOUGHT & CONSECIENCE; EXPRESSION; ASSEMBLY & ASSOCIATION; EQUALITY

Legislation banning hunting with dogs could not be challenged under Articles 8, 9, 10, 11 or 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/2005/CSIH_69.html

 

Occidental Exploration and Petroleum Company v Republic of Ecuador
[2005] EWCA Civ 1116
Court of Appeal, 9 September 2005: INTERPRETATION

English courts are not wholly precluded from interpreting or having regard to the provisions of unincorporated treaties .

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1116.html

 

August 2005

Last updated 1 September 2005.


CANADA

Attorney General v Vincent Estate
2005 FCA 272
Federal Court of Appeal, 15 August 2005: STANDING; ACCESS TO JUSTICE; REMEDIES; EQUALITY

Consideration of whether the estate of a deceased claimant could continue an outstanding pension rights claim when it rested on the allegation that a provision of the pension plan violated her equality rights; where no action is taken by the person during their lifetime, the right to a remedy for a violation of constitutionally protected rights dies with them, but does not preclude the possibility that constitutional rights could be crystallised by appropriate action during their lifetime by the person whose rights were infringed.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fca/2005/2005fca272.html

 

Khadr v Canada
2005 FC 1076
Federal Court, 8 August 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; RIGHT TO SILENCE; LEGAL REPRESENTATION; REMEDIES

Terrorist suspect held at Guantanamo granted interim injunction to prevent further questioning by security agents prior to trial in order to prevent potential grave injustice occasioned by failure to inform him of his rights to be informed of charges against him, remain silent and be afforded legal representation; injunction against the Crown for conduct in violation of Charter rights may be granted, provided relevant preconditions are met.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fct/2005/2005fc1076.html

 

FIJI

Nadan & Anor v The State
Crim Appeal Case Nos.: HAA 85 & 86/2005
High Court, 26 August 2005: SEXUALITY; EQUALITY; PRIVACY; DIGNITY; DEGRADING TREATMENT

Criminalisation of consenting adult homosexual acts carried out in private declared unconstitutional.

Click here for full text.

 

NEW ZEALAND

The Queen v Savelio
CA234/96
Court of Appeal, 5 August 2005: PRIVACY, SEARCH & SEIZURE

Accused not entitled to exclusion of evidence based on breaches of privacy rights which were not personal to him; wrongly issued search warrant did not automatically make search unreasonable.

Full text at http://www.brookers.co.nz/legal/judgments/

 

Sungsowan v The Queen
[2005] NZSC 57
Supreme Court, 25 August 2005: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE

Failure of jury to hear evidence that had bearing on credibility of complainant did not result in miscarriage of justice where insufficiently material to outcome; comments made by prosecutor did not breach principle that counsel cannot impeach his own witness.

Full text at http://www.justice.govt.nz/judgments/

 

SAMOA

Philip v Maxima Resources Corporation
[2005] WSSC 12
Supreme Court, 17 August 2005: FAIR HEARING

Inconvenience to overseas witnesses insufficiently onerous to outweigh need for fairness so that required to give testimony in person rather than by video link.

Full text at http://www.paclii.org/ws/cases/WSSC/2005/12.html

 

TONGA

R v Makahununiu
[2005] TOSC 21
Supreme Court, 18 August 2005: TORTURE; EVIDENCE

Confession ruled inadmissible following substantiated allegations of assaults and ill-treatment whilst in custody.

Full text at http://www.paclii.org/to/cases/TOSC/2005/21.html

 

UNITED KINGDOM

Gate Gourmet Ltd v Transport and General Workers Union
[2005] EWHC 1889 (QB)
High Court, 21 August 2005: ASSEMBLY; EXPRESSION

Right to picket during industrial dispute recognised subject to not committing unlawful or tortious acts; due weight to be given to rights to assembly and expression in considering whether to grant injunction limiting trade union activity.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2005/1889.html

 

VANUATU

Public Prosecutor v Emelee
[2005] VUCA 11
Court of Appeal, 6 June 2005: FAIR HEARING, DELAY

Delay of 18 months between charge and trial not unreasonable in conspiracy case where no prejudice to accused; consideration of delay is not a mathematical calculation but must be determined on a consideration of the particular facts of each case.

Full text at http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUCA/2005/11.html

 

 

July 2005

Last updated 1 August 2005

AUSTRALIA

Northern Territory of Australia v Alyawarr, Kaytetye, Warumungu, Wakaya Native Title Claim Group
[2005] FCAFC 135
Federal Court, 29 July 2005: INDIGENOUS PEOPLE; LAND

Determination and definition of aboriginal title rights and interests in land.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2005/135.html

 

QAAH of 2004 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 136
Federal Court, 27 July 2005: REFUGEES

Approach to be taken to possible cessation of refugee status.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2005/136.html

Rubibi Community (No 5) v State of Western Australia
[2005] FCA 1025
Federal Court, 29 July 2005: INDIGENOUS PEOPLE; LAND

Determination of competing claims for communal and group native title rights and interests.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/federal_ct/2005/1025.html

 

S76 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 120
Federal Court, 4 July 2005: REFUGEES; RELIGION

Requirement to consider effect of asylum seeker’s apostasy from Islam as distinct from his contracting a mixed marriage; claimant could relocate to live among "liberal minded" people away from his ancestral village to avoid persecution.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2005/120.html

 

South Pacific Resort Hotels Pty Ltd v Trainor
[2005] FCAFC 130
Federal Court, 15 July 2005: WORK; EQUALITY; REMEDIES

Employer vicariously liable for sexual harassment committed by one employee against another at workplace.

Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2005/130.html

 

 

CANADA

R v Marshall; R v Bernard
2005 SCC 43
Supreme Court, 20 July 2005: INDIGENOUS PEOPLE; LAND

Consideration of aboriginal title to lands they used for logging.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc43.html

 

Telus Communications Inc. v Telecommunications Workers Union
2005 FCA 262
Federal Court of Appeal, 25 July 2005: FAIR HEARING, BIAS; WORK

Allegations of bias in Industrial Relations Board seeking to determine labour dispute unfounded.

Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fca/2005/2005fca262.html

 

CYPRUS

The Attorney General for the Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia v Steinhoff
[2005] UKPC 30

Privy Council, 1 July 2005: FAIR HEARING, EQUALITY OF ARMS

Screening of main prosecution witness from accused during her examination did not result in substantial miscarriage of justice.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/30.html

 

HONG KONG

Lweung Kwok Hung & Ors v HKSAR
[2005] HKCFA 37
Court of Final Appeal, 8 July 2005: EXPRESSION; ASSEMBLY

Statutory discretion conferred on the Commissioner of Police to exercise prior restraint in restricting the right of peaceful assembly for the purpose of public order was too wide and uncertain to satisfy the requirements of constitutionality.

Full text at http://www.hklii.org/hk/jud/en/hkcfa/2005/FACC000001_2005.html

 

NEW ZEALAND

Howse v The Queen
[2005] UKPC 31
Privy Council, 21 June 2005: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE

Improper admission of hearsay evidence did not result in unfair trial given overwhelming nature of prosecution case.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/31.html

 

SAMOA

Police v Faulkner
[2005] WSSC 4
Supreme Court, 14 March 2005: FAIR HEARING

Filing of additional charges against the accused 21 months after the presentation of the original charges breached his right to be informed promptly about the nature and cause of the accusation against him.

Full text at http://www.paclii.org/ws/cases/WSSC/2005/4.html

 

TUVALU

Tepulolo v Pou
[2005] TVHC 1
High Court, 24 January 2005: EQUALITY; WOMEN; INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS

Discrimination on grounds of gender could not be read into constitutional provision; in absence of incorporation legislation courts did not have the power to correct or amend existing laws to bring them in line with international treaty obligations.

Full text at http://www.paclii.org/tv/cases/TVHC/2005/1.html

 

 

UNITED KINGDOM

Armstrong v Times Newspapers Ltd & Ors
[2005] EWCA Civ 1007
Court of Appeal, 29 July 2005: EXPRESSION

Defence of qualified privilege restored prior to libel trial.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1007.html

 

B v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
[2005] EWCA Civ 929
Court of Appeal, 20 July 2005: EQUALITY; PROPERTY; SOCIAL SECURITY; DISABILITY

State’s denial of social security benefits to mentally disabled person based on lack of information about her changed circumstances did not amount to interference with her possessions based on unlawful discrimination; incorrect to compare people who were unable to report facts because they were not aware of them with people who, like the claimant, were unable to report them for some other reason such as her incapacity.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/929.html

 

Betts v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2005] EWCA Civ 828
Court of Appeal, 6 July 2005: REFUGEES; PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE

No exceptional circumstances under Article 8 ECHR warranting prevention of return of failed asylum seeker to Sierra Leone.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/828.html

 

Burke, R (on the application of) v General Medical Council & Ors
[2005] EWCA Civ 1003
Court of Appeal, 28 July 2005: LIFE; CRUEL, INHUMAN AND DEGRADING TREATMENT; PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE; HEALTH

Where death is not imminent, the withholding or withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration, leading to death by starvation or thirst, not through natural causes could breach Articles 2, 3 and 8 of the ECHR; d octors required to provide life-prolonging treatment only whilst mentally competent terminally ill patient has the ability to ask for it.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1003.html

 

Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis v Hurst
[2005] EWCA Civ 890
Court of Appeal, 21 July 2005: LIFE

Extent of coroner’s duty to re-open an inquest in light of Article 2 ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/890.html

 

Dudson, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2005] UKHL 52
House of Lords, 28 July 2005: FAIR HEARING; SENTENCING

No requirement for oral hearing in conducting review of minimum term to be served by juvenile for murder.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/52.html

 

HC v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2005] EWCA Civ 893
Court of Appeal, 20 July 2005: REFUGEES; SEXUALITY

Tribunal erred in failing to consider difficulties faced by gay young Palestinian asylum seeker in Lebanese refugee camp.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/893.html

 

Kehoe, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
[2005] UKHL 48
House of Lords, 14 July 2005: FAIR HEARING, ACCESS TO JUSTICE; FAMILY, CHILDREN

Statutory provisions giving divorced wife right to recover financial support for her children from her former husband but denying her a power of direct enforcement against him were not inconsistent with the right of access to a court guaranteed by Article 6 of the ECHR .

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/48.html

 

McClean, Re
[2005] UKHL 46
House of Lords, 7 July 2005: FAIR HEARING; LIBERTY & SECURITY

Process revoking decision to release IRA prisoner under Good Friday Agreement did not breach Article 6 ECHR.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/46.html

 

R (Iran) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2005] EWCA Civ 982
Court of Appeal, 27 July 2005: REFUGEES; FAIR HEARING

Compliance of statutory immigration scheme with human rights.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/982.html

 

R v Becouarn
[2005] UKHL 55
House of Lords, 28 July 2005: FAIR HEARING

Direction to jury that inference could be drawn about defendant’s failure to give evidence at trial or retrial that he would be unable to answer prosecution case or stand up to cross examination was not unfair.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/55.html

 

Roberts v Parole Board
[2005] UKHL 45
House of Lords, 7 July 2005: FAIR HEARING, LEGAL REPRESENTATION, DISCLOSURE, EQUALITY OF ARMS; LIBERTY & SECURITY

Parole Board exercised lawful power in withholding relevant material from parolee’s legal representatives and, instead, disclosing it to a specially appointed advocate, who would represent him, in his absence and his legal representatives, at a closed review hearing.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/45.html

 

Secretary of State for the Home Department v Akaeke
[2005] EWCA Civ 947
Court of Appeal, 27 July 2005: IMMIGRATION; PRIVATE & FAMILY LIFE

Length of delays in determining claim meant that it was disproportionate to require failed asylum seeker to temporarily disrupt family life in order to return to country of origin to make lawful immigration application based on marriage.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/947.html

 

Smith, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2005] UKHL 51
House of Lords, 28 July 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; SENTENCING; JUVENILES

Minimum term to be served by a juvenile convicted of murder should be subject to periodic review even where length of term has been fixed by the Lord Chief Justice.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/51.html

 

Stephenson, R (on the application of) v Stockton on Tees Borough Council
[2005] EWCA Civ 960
Court of Appeal, 26 July 2005: PRIVATE & FAMILY LIFE; DISABILITY; EQUALITY

Permissible for council to disregard disability related expenditure paid by it to a disabled person’s family member when assessing the person’s net income for the purpose of deciding how much she should pay towards the home care support provided for her by the council; rule did not breach disabled person’s right to respect for her private and family life or discriminate against her.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/960.html

 

Strbac & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2005] EWCA Civ 848
Court of Appeal, 11 July 2005: REFUGEES; PRIVATE & FAMILY LIFE; EQUALITY; CRUEL, INHUMAN AND DEGRADING TREATMENT

No grounds under either Article 3 or Article 8 to justify preventing removal of failed Serb asylum seeker to Croatia; Article 8 does not confer a right to a home.

Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/848.html

 

 

June 2005

Last updated 1 July 2005.

 

AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Hamdan
[2005] FCAFC 113
Federal Court, 9 June 2005: LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE
No requirement for legal adviser to release telephone number confidentially communicated to him by illegal immigrant who failed to attend court hearing in order to provide information on latter’s whereabouts, since communication was protected by legal professional privilege.
Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2005/113.html

SVTB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 104
Federal Court, 3 June 2005: REFUGEES; WOMEN
Single women in a country who do not have the protection of male relatives can constitute a particular social group; applicant did not face a real chance of persecution through sexual assault or trafficking by reason of her membership of that group; fact that particular claimed events have not occurred in the past does not logically lead to the conclusion that there is no real chance of something occurring in the future, although it may be an indication of such a conclusion.
Full text at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2005/104.html

CANADA
Chaoulli v Quebec (Attorney General)
2005 SCC 35
Supreme Court, 9 June 2005: LIFE; LIBERTY & SECURITY; HEALTH
Provincial legislation prohibiting residents from taking out insurance to obtain private sector health care services already available under a public health care plan and thereby depriving them of access to private health care services not subject to waiting times inherent in the public system infringed their rights to life and to personal inviolability.
Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc35.html

Mugesera v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
2005 SCC 39
Supreme Court, 28 June 2005: BIAS; ABUSE OF PROCESS
No grounds for alleging Minister’s decision to appeal deportation decision strongly influenced by certain organisations; no abuse of process in appointing to Supreme Court judge whose spouse chaired committee of one of these organisations; duty on the part of one member of our Court to recuse him or herself does not automatically attach to the rest of the Court or compromise their integrity.
Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc39.html

Mugesera v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
2005 SCC 40
Supreme Court, 28 June 2005: CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY; IMMIGRATION
For a crime committed abroad, a conclusion that the elements of the crime in Canadian criminal law have been made out will be deemed to be determinative in respect of the commission of crimes under the other country’s criminal law. On requisite standard of proof under immigration law - balance of probabilities – accused guilty of incitement to murder, genocide or hatred and therefore should not be admitted.
Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc40.html

R v Orbanski; R v Elias
2005 SCC 37
Supreme Court, 16 June 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; LEGAL REPRESENTATION
Roadside screening measures to assess sobriety of drivers requiring them to be stopped while driving vehicles and asked if they had been drinking were a justified restriction on their liberty not requiring them to be informed of their right to counsel.
Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc37.html

Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd. v Ontario
2005 SCC 41
Supreme Court, 29 June 2005: EXPRESSION
Prosecution failed to demonstrate a serious and specific risk to the integrity of the criminal investigation justifying an order denying the media access to search warrant material; the Dagenais/Mentuck test should be applied in a flexible and contextual manner extending to all discretionary court orders limiting freedom of expression and freedom of the press in relation to legal proceedings including orders to seal search warrant materials made upon application by the Crown.
Full text at http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc41.html

GIBRALTAR
Attorney General v Shimizu
[2005] UKPC 26
Privy Council, 28 June 2005: EQUALITY OF ARMS; PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE
Legislation permitting the making of costs against a convicted defendant in favour of the prosecution but not vice versa upon acquittal (save in rare cases) did not infringe former’s fair trial guarantees.
Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/26.html

NEW ZEALAND
Attorney General v Zaoui & Ors
[2005] NZSC 38
Supreme Court, 21 June 2005: REFUGEES; LIBERTY & SECURITY; LIFE; CRUEL, INHUMAN TREATMENT
Security certificate issued against refugee revoking his status and requiring his deportation must be made only if there are reasonable grounds for believing that latter poses serious threat to security based on objectively reasonable grounds with the threatened harm being substantial; deportation must not take place where subject is at risk of losing his life or being subject to torture or cruel or inhuman treatment.
Full text at http://www.justice.govt.nz/judgments

SOUTH AFRICA
Western Cape Minister of Education & Ors v The Governing Body of Mikro Primary School
SCA 140/05
Supreme Court of Appeal, 27 June 2005: EDUCATION; LANGUAGE
Right to receive education in an official language at a public education institution did not amount to a right to receive such education at each and every public institution.
Full text at http://www.law.wits.ac.za/sca/judgment.php?case_id=13073

NK v Minister of Safety and Security
CCT 52/04
Constitutional Court, 13 June 2005: REMEDIES, LIABILITY
Minister vicariously liable for wrongful conduct of policemen in raping and assaulting victim.
Full text at http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/kern.html

UNITED KINGDOM

Degnan & Ors v Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council
[2005] EWCA Civ 726
Court of Appeal, 17 June 2005: EQUALITY; WORK
Female equal pay claimants not entitled to compare themselves with the relevant male comparator most advantageous to them.
Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/726.html

Fornah v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2005] EWCA Civ 680
Court of Appeal, 9 June 2005: REFUGEES; CRUEL, INHUMAN TREATMENT; WOMEN
Girls at risk of FGM did not form part of a particular social group for purposes of Refugee Convention since group did not exist independently of persecution.
Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/680.html

Hysi v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2005] EWCA Civ 711
Court of Appeal, 15 June 2005: REFUGEES
Insufficient examination of whether Roma mixed race asylum seeker could return and successfully relocate to Kosovo.
Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/711.html

J (a child), Re
[2005] UKHL 40
House of Lords, 16 June 2005: CHILDREN; FAMILY LIFE; EQUALITY
Approach to be adopted in applications for the summary return of children to countries which are not parties to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction; consideration of relevant human rights issues.
Full text at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/40.html

Rashid, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2005] EWCA Civ 744
Court of Appeal, 16 June 2005: REFUGEES
Failure over 15 months to apply correct policy to Iraqi Kurd claiming asylum amounted to unfairness and abuse of process.
Full text at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/744.html

UNITED STATES
Halbert v Michigan
03-10198
Supreme Court, 23 June 2005: LEGAL REPRESENTATION; EQUALITY OF ARMS; APPEALS
Due process and equal protection required indigent defendants to be granted legal aid when appealing their convictions.
Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04slipopinion.html

McCreary County, Kentucky & Ors v ACLU of Kentucky & Ors
03-1693
Supreme Court, 27 June 2005: RELIGION; INDEPENDENCE OF JUDICIARY
Copies of Ten Commandments should not be displayed inside courthouses.
Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04slipopinion.html

Miller & Ors v Dretke
03-9659
Supreme Court, 13 June 2005: EQUALITY
Disproportionate peremptory strikes against prospective black jurors constituted racial discrimination.
Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04slipopinion.html

Van Orden v Perry
03-1500
Supreme Court, 27 June 2005: RELIGION
Ten Commandments could be displayed prominently outside Texas State Legislature.
Full text at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04slipopinion.html

 

May 2005

Last updated June 2005

 

AUSTRALIA

Applicant NABD of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[2005] HCA 29
High Court, 26 May 2005: REFUGEES; RELIGION
Refugee Tribunal entitled to distinguish between Christians in Iran who were at real risk of persecution because they were engaged in active proselytism and those who were not because they kept a low profile.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2005/29.html

Rocca v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 71
Federal Court, 10 May 2005: IMMIGRATION; CHILDREN
Authorities not bound by ratification of Convention on the Rights of the Child to take into account best interests of applicant's children and grandchildren in deciding to cancel his visa.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2005/71.html

SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[2005] HCA 24
High Court, 18 May 2005: REFUGEES; FAIR HEARING
Asylum seekers denied procedural fairness by failure to give them proper notice about the circumstances in which Tribunal procured evidence taken in private from eldest daughter of one of them, the relevance of her testimony and opportunity to comment on it.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2005/24.html

VNAY v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 96
Federal Court, 13 May 2005: REFUGEES, POLITICAL OPINION
Asylum seeker denied protection where fear of persecution arose not from a Convention reason, i.e. political opinion, but due to threat of murder by non-state political figure; discussion of ‘political opinion': knowledge that loaned vehicle was used for political propaganda did not constitute such opinion.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2005/96.html

 

CANADA

House of Commons and Anor v Vaid and Anor
2005 SCC 30
Supreme Court, 20 May 2005: PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE; JURISDICTION
Human rights legislation applicable to Parliamentary employees; scope of Parliamentary privilege.

Full text at
www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/en/rec/html/2005scc030.wpd.html

Smith and Nephew Inc v Glegg
2005 SCC 31
Supreme Court, 20 May 2005: PRIVACY; DISCLOSURE
Waiver of medical profession confidentiality does not authorise unlimited and uncontrolled access to medical records. Access will depend on relevance of requested information to merits of case and conduct of defence.

Full text at
www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/en/rec/html/2005scc031.wpd.html

 

DOMINICA

Langford and Anor v The State
[2005] UKPC 20
Privy Council, 11 May 2005: FAIR HEARING
Summing up on identification evidence failed to satisfy Turnbull requirements.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/20.html

 

NEW ZEALAND

Morgan v The Superintendent, Rimutaka Prison
[2005] NZSC 26
Supreme Court, 19 May 2005: LIBERTY AND SECURITY, SENTENCING
No infringement of prisoner's right to a lesser penalty requiring early release since change in legislation did not vary maximum tariff.

Full text at
http://www.justice.govt.nz/judgments

 

SOUTH AFRICA

Laugh It Off Promotions CC v South African Breweries (Finance) B.V. t/a Sabmark International
CCT 42/04
Constitutional Court, 27 May 2005: EXPRESSION
Satire protected by right to free speech.

Full text at
www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/laughitoff.html

The President of the Republic of South Africa and Anor v Modderklip Boerdery (PTY) Ltd
CCT 20/04
Constitutional Court, 13 May 2005: HOUSING; PROPERTY; REMEDIES
Unreasonable for private entity to bear the burden for providing illegal occupiers of land with accommodation; breach of private entity's right to an effective remedy; compensation for loss instead of restitution allowed squatters to have accommodation until suitable alternatives were found.

Full text at
www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/modderklip.html

Sibiya and Ors v Director of Public Prosecutions (Johannesburg High Court) and Ors
CCT 45/04
Constitutional Court, 25 May 2005: DEATH PENALTY; SENTENCING; FAIR HEARING
Procedure for replacing death penalty with other sentences did not infringe fair trial rights where accused had already received fair hearing at original trial.

Full text at
www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/Sibiya.html

 

UNITED KINGDOM

Alabaster v Barclays Bank Plc & Anor
[2005] EWCA Civ 508
Court of Appeal, 3 May 2005: EQUALITY; WORK
Claim for sex discrimination in relation to non payment of increased maternity pay could dispense with need for male comparator as stipulated by Equal Pay Act.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/508.html

Attorney General v Scotcher
[2005] UKHL 36
House of Lords, 19 May 2005: EXPRESSION
Holding juror in contempt of court for disclosing information he received in confidence from his fellow jurors was a reasonable restriction on his freedom of expression.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/36.html

Bagdanavicius and Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2005] UKHL 38
House of Lords, 26 May 2005: TORTURE AND ILL TREATMENT; REFUGEES, DEPORTATION
Risk of ill treatment from non-state agents insufficient to prevent deportation in absence of evidence that state will not offer reasonable level of protection.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/38.html

Carson, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
[2005] UKHL 37
House of Lords, 26 May 2005: EQUALITY; SOCIAL SECURITY
Ex-patriates' lack of entitlement to annual state pension increases did not amount to unfair discrimination.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/37.html

Dbeis and Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2005] EWCA Civ 584
Court of Appeal, 19 May 2005: REFUGEES; PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE; HEALTH; EDUCATION
Reasonable to return failed asylum seeker and her son suffering from cerebral palsy to country of origin where there were adequate medical and education facilities.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/584.html

Douglas and Ors v Hello! Ltd and Ors
[2005] EWCA Civ 595
Court of Appeal, 18 May 2005: PRIVACY; REMEDIES; EXPRESSION
Breach of celebrities' privacy by magazine upheld; consideration of appropriate level of damages and other relief.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/595.html

Holland v Her Majesty's Advocate (Devolution)
[2005] UKPC D1
Privy Council, 11 May 2005: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE
Use of dock identification evidence is not per se incompatible with the right to a fair trial.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/D1.html

Hooper and Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
[2005] UKHL 29
House of Lords, 5 May 2005: EQUALITY; SOCIAL SECURITY; PROPERTY; PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE
Denial of widows' benefits to widowers did not amount to unfair discrimination based on objective justification of women's disproportionate economic inactivity.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/29.html

J v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2005] EWCA Civ 629
Court of Appeal, 24 May 2005: REFUGEES; TORTURE AND ILL TREATMENT; LIFE; PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE; MENTAL HEALTH
No real risk of suicide to justify preventing deportation of failed asylum seeker back to country of origin.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/629.html

Machado v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2005] EWCA Civ 597
Court of Appeal, 19 May 2005: REFUGEES; PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE
Insufficient scrutiny by Tribunal of proportionality of impact on failed asylum seeker's right to private and family life of state's decision to deport him.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/597.html

N v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2005] UKHL 31
House of Lords, 5 May 2005: REFUGEES; HEALTH; LIFE; INHUMAN TREATMENT
No breach of Article 3 ECHR by deporting failed asylum seeker with terminal HIV/AIDS back to country of origin with limited medical facilities; Article 3 does not require contracting states to undertake the obligation of providing aliens with indefinite medical treatment lacking in their home countries.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/31.html

Quayle and Ors v R
[2005] EWCA Crim 1415
Court of Appeal, 27 May 2005: PRIVATE LIFE
Drugs legislation banning cultivation and possession of cannabis did not conflict with right to private life.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/D2.html

Sinclair v Her Majesty's Advocate (Devolution)
[2005] UKPC D2
Privy Council, 11 May 2005: FAIR HEARING; EQUALITY OF ARMS
Failure of prosecution to produce or disclose to the accused the existence and contents of statements made to the police by a witness who corroborated the complainer's account of the incident was incompatible with the appellant's right to a fair trial.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/D2.html

Wilkinson, R (on the application of) v Inland Revenue
[2005] UKHL 30
House of Lords, 5 May 2005: EQUALITY; PROPERTY; PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE
Tax law denying widowers widows' bereavement allowance by way of deduction from their income tax liability was not discriminatory.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/30.html

 

UNITED STATES

Clingman v Beaver
04-37
Supreme Court, 23 May 2005: POLITICAL PARTICIPATION; ASSOCIATION
State's semiclosed primary system permitting political parties to invite only their own registered members and voters registered as independents to vote in their primary elections did not breach right to freedom of association.

Full text at
www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04slipopinion.html

Deck v Missouri
04-5293
Supreme Court, 23 May 2005: DEATH PENALTY; SENTENCING; LIBERTY AND SECURITY
Routine use of shackles and leg irons on convicted defendant in sentencing stage of capital murder case and absent any justified security concerns undermines jury's ability to make a fair and balanced decision on whether death penalty should be imposed or not.

Full text at
www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04slipopinion.html

 

April 2005

Last updated May 2005

AUSTRALIA

Berry v Murray Goulbourn Co-operative Ltd
(U2004/6443)
Industrial Relations Commission, 21 April 2005: MENTAL ILLNESS; WORK

Employee should be reinstated where misconduct leading to dismissal was as a result of mental illness.

Full text at
http://www.airc.gov.au/documents/full_bench/
full_bench_decisions.html

In the Matter of an Application by the Chief Commissioner of Police (Vic)
[2005] HCA 18
High Court, 20 April 2005: FAIR HEARING, APPEAL, EVIDENCE

Appeal from order of trial judge to prohibit, for a limited time, the publication of methods and material used by police in murder investigations lay only by way of leave and not as of right; no lack of procedural fairness where appeal court only considered evidence relating to granting of leave and not substantive issues of appeal.

Full text at
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2005/18.html

Mohammed v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 47
Federal Court, 8 April 2005: FAIR HEARING; IMMIGRATION

No denial of due process in decision to revoke student visa.

Full text at
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2005/47.html

 

CANADA

Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Williams
2005 FCA 126
Federal Court of Appeal, 12 April 2005: REFUGEES; NATIONALITY

Asylum seeker not deprived of the right of citizenship when he is given the possibility of renouncing the citizenship of a country where he is at risk of persecution in exchange for acquiring the citizenship of another where he is not at risk.

Full text at
http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fca/2005/2005fca126.html

Poshteh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
2005 FCA 121

Federal Court of Appeal, 8 April 2005: REFUGEES; CHILDREN; LIBERTY & SECURITY

Principles of fundamental justice as guaranteed by s 7 of the Charter did not apply in consideration of whether a minor seeking asylum was entitled to special treatment where his presence was considered a threat to national security.

Full text at
http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fca/2005/2005fca121.html

R v Chow
2005 SCC 24
Supreme Court, 27 April 2005: PRIVACY, SEARCH & SEIZURE; FAIR HEARING, EQUALITY OF ARMS

Right to privacy was not violated by the authorised interception of accused's private telephone conversations since he was not a "known" person within the meaning of s. 185(1) of the Criminal Code when the initial authorizations were sought and obtained and, even assuming he was, other evidence unaffected by the alleged breach of his Charter rights amply supported the subsequent authorisations. Accused was not entitled to severance of trial in order to compel a co-accused to testify; denial of severance did not deprive accused of right to make full answer and defence.

Full text at
http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc24.html

R v Mapara
2005 SCC 23
Supreme Court, 27 April 2005: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE; PRIVACY

Co-conspirator's exception to the hearsay rule meets the necessity and reliability requirements of the principled approach to hearsay and should not be set aside or altered even when applying to double hearsay.

Police did not breach interception authorisation where they recorded a three way conversation between the named person in the authorisation, the accused and a third party where the named person did not cease to be a party to the conversation.

Full text at
http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc23.html

Sing v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
2005 FCA 125
Federal Court of Appeal, 11 April 2005: REFUGEES; TORTURE

Government has the onus to provide credible or trustworthy evidence on which a Refugee Tribunal can determine whether a claimant should be excluded from the Convention refugee definition; statements obtained by torture or other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment are neither credible or trustworthy.

Full text at
http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fca/2005/2005fca125.html

Tahmourpour v Canada (Solicitor General) 2005 FCA 113
Federal Court of Appeal, 6 April 2005: EQUALITY; FAIR HEARING

Investigation by Human Rights Commission of discrimination complaint did not meet the test of thoroughness and therefore fairness where it failed to investigate and analyse relevant statistical data and to conduct interviews of relevant witnesses leading to "obviously crucial evidence" being overlooked.

Full text at
http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fca/2005/2005fca113.html

 

TRINIDAD & TOBAGO

Campbell v Hamlet
[2005] UKPC 19
Privy Council, 25 April 2005: FAIR HEARING

Conviction for manslaughter quashed after judge's direction on content of charge was held to be seriously deficient.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/19.html

 

UNITED KINGDOM

Brooks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis & Ors
[2005] UKHL 24
House of Lords, 21 April 2005: LIFE, POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS

Police were not under a duty of care to (a) take reasonable steps to assess whether an individual was a victim of crime and then to accord him reasonably appropriate protection, support, assistance and treatment if he was so assessed; (b) take reasonable steps to afford him the protection, assistance and support commonly afforded to a key eye-witness to a serious crime of violence; and (c) afford reasonable weight to the account that he gave and to act upon it accordingly, since to expect them to do so would unduly hinder the police's operational effectiveness.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/24.html

JD v East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust & Ors
[2005] UKHL 23
House of Lords, 21 April 2005: FAMILY LIFE; CHILDREN

Parents' rights under Article 8 ECHR not breached by denying that they are owed a duty of care by doctors or social workers who have falsely or negligently accused them of child abuse.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/23.html

R v Mushtaq
[2005] UKHL 25
House of Lords, 21 April 2005: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE

Article 6 ECHR does not require that a judge, who has ruled that a confession has not been obtained by oppression, nor is unreliable for any other reason, direct the jury, if they conclude that the alleged confession may have been so obtained, that they must disregard it.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/25.html

Sritharan v Law Society
[2005] EWCA Civ 476
Court of Appeal, 27 April 2005: PROPERTY

Law Society's decision to intervene in a solicitor's practice could, under certain circumstances, breach the latter's right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/476.html

 

March 2005

AUSTRALIA

Ali v The Queen
[2005] HCA 8
High Court, 8 March 2005: FAIR HEARING, LEGAL REPRESENTATION; EVIDENCE

Counsel's failure to apply for separate trial and to object to evidence of bad character did not deprive accused of fair hearing.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/
HCA/2005/8.html

 

NAGV and NAGW of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2005] HCA 6
High Court, 2 March 2005: REFUGEES

Availability of effective protection in third country did not negate obligations to refugees under the Refugee Convention; non-refoulement obligation precludes removal to a safe third country.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/
HCA/2005/6.html

 

Le v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 51
Federal Court, 31 March 2005: REFUGEES; FAIR HEARING; CHILDREN

Duty to take into account best interests of children in considering extension of visa for parent; lack of due process not established.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/
FCAFC/2005/51.html

 

Peacock v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission
[2005] FCAFC 45
Federal Court, 24 March 2005: EQUALITY; WORK

Refusal of Minister to exercise discretion to exempt employees from compulsory retirement did not amount to unlawful discrimination.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/
FCAFC/2005/45.html

 

SRYYY v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 42
Federal Court, 17 March 2005: REFUGEES; WAR CRIMES & CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

Immigration appeals tribunal failed to consider applicability of ICC Rome Statute and correct definitions of war crimes and crimes against humanity in denying suspect's refugee claim; extensive discussion of development of international criminal law.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/
FCAFC/2005/42.html

 

MZQAP v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 35
Federal Court, 15 March 2005: REFUGEES

Consideration of the circumstances in which conduct undertaken pursuant to a law of the country of nationality of a putative refugee may constitute persecution within the meaning of Article 1A(2) of the Convention; prosecution for membership of a proscribed organisation under a general law of application did not equate to persecution.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/
FCAFC/2005/35.html

 

Sebastian v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 31
Federal Court, 14 March 2005: REFUGEES; CHILDREN

Tribunal was correct to consider a range of factors (including but not exclusively whether he should remain with parents) when deciding whether it was in best interests of child to grant father protection visa.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/
FCAFC/2005/31.html

 

NAIZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 37
Federal Court, 11 March 2005: REFUGEES

Reasonableness of expecting asylum seeker to be able to relocate within country of origin in order to avoid harassment and assault on grounds of ethnicity.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/
FCAFC/2005/37.html

 

BAHAMAS

Knowles & Ors v Superintendent of HM Prison Fox Hill & Ors
[2005] UKPC 17
Privy Council, 23 March 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; JURISDICTION

Court of Appeal lacked jurisdiction to set aside decision granting bail.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/17.html

 

BELIZE

Meerabux v Attorney General
[2005] UKPC 12
Privy Council, 23 March 2005: FAIR HEARING, BIAS, PUBLIC HEARING

Mere membership of Bar Association from which majority of complaints arose against a judge insufficient to disqualify person from presiding over judicial disciplinary proceedings; no requirement to hold proceedings in public.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/12.html

 

CANADA

Gosselin (Tutor of) & Ors v Attorney General of Quebec & Anor
[2005] SCC 15
Supreme Court, 31 March 2005: EQUALITY; MINORITIES; LANGUAGE; EDUCATION

Right to equality did not require all children in Quebec to be given access to publicly funded English language education; equality guarantees cannot be used to invalidate other rights expressly conferred by the Constitution including a comprehensive code for minority language education rights under s 23 of the Charter of Rights.

Full text at
http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc15.html

 

HONG KONG

Chou Shih Bin v HKSAR
2005 HKFCA 15
Final Court of Appeal, 15 March 2005: FAIR HEARING, PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

Incorrect shifting of burden of proof by inferring accused had guilty knowledge about presence of unlicensed firearm and ammunition in bag.

Full text at
www.hklii.org/hk/jud/en/hkcfa/
2005/FACC000011_2004.html

 

Tsang Wai Ping v HKSAR
2005 HKFCA 16
Final Court of Appeal, 11 March 2005: PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

Acquitting defendant on technicality did not justify denying him costs and could infringe presumption of innocence.

Full text at
www.hklii.org/hk/jud/en/hkcfa/
2005/FACC000012_2004.html

 

Lin Ping Keung v HKSAR
2005 HKFCA 11
Final Court of Appeal, 10 March 2005: FAIR HEARING

Judge's errors of fact and adverse comments in the form of rhetorical questions resulted in substantial and grave injustice requiring quashing of conviction.

Full text at
www.hklii.org/hk/jud/en/hkcfa/
2005/FACC000013_2004.html

 

NEW ZEALAND

Sun Poi Lai v Chamberlains
CA17/03
Court of Appeal, 8 March 2005: LEGAL REPRESENTATION; REMEDIES

Barristerial immunity for liability to a client for negligence in respect of acts or omissions in the conduct of a case in court or preliminary work should be abolished.

Full text at
http://www.brookers.co.nz/legal/judgments/

 

Morgan v Superintendent Rimutaka Prison
CA17/05
Court of Appeal, 7 March 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY

Principle against retrospective effect of legislation giving effect to a detrimental change in the penalty for an offence, is not breached by extending parole eligibility period.

Full text at
http://www.brookers.co.nz/legal/judgments/

 

Edwin Brown v Attorney General
CA 39/03
Court of Appeal,
3 March 2005: FAIR HEARING

Denial of legal aid to pay for DNA testing did not result in breach of accused's fair trial rights.

Full text at
http://www.brookers.co.nz/legal/judgments/

 

Link Technology 2000 Ltd & Anor v Attorney General
CA191/03
Court of Appeal, 3 March 2005: REMEDIES

A finding of a breach of the Bill of Rights does not, of itself, establish liability to pay compensation since it is a discretionary remedy.

Full text at
http://www.brookers.co.nz/legal/judgments/

SOUTH AFRICA

The Affordable Medicines & Ors v The Minister of Health of RSA & Ors
CCT 27/04
Constitutional Court, 11 March 2005: HEALTH

Licensing scheme for dispensing of drugs and medicines by doctors and dentists aimed at increasing access to safe medicines upheld.

Full text at
www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/
AffordableMedicines.html

 

TRINIDAD & TOBAGO

Attorney General v Ramanoop
[2005] UKPC 15
Privy Council, 23 March 2005: REMEDIES

Exemplary damages could be awarded for breach of constitutional rights provisions.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/15.html

 

Teeluck & Anor v The State
[2005] UKPC 14
Privy Council, 23 March 2005: FAIR HEARING, LEGAL REPRESENTATION

Failure of counsel to bring out accused's good character and ensure judicial direction to that effect resulted in miscarriage of justice.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/14.html

 

UNITED KINGDOM

B, R (on the application of) v Ashworth Hospital Authority
[2005] UKHL 20
House of Lords, 17 March 2005: MENTAL HEALTH; LIBERTY & SECURITY; CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT

Treatment in mental hospital did not breach patient's ECHR rights; no requirement to determine compatibility of s 63 of the Mental Health Act authorising compulsory treatment of mental health patients with Human Rights Act.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/20.html

 

Hasan, R v
[2005] UKHL 22
House of Lords, 17 March 2005: FAIR HEARING

Principles for judicial directions on duress.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/22.html

 

R, R (on the application of) v Durham Constabulary & Anor
[2005] UKHL 21
House of Lords, 17 March 2005: JUVENILE JUSTICE; FAIR HEARING

Scheme for issuing warnings to a juvenile without his consent or that of parent or guardian was compatible with Article 6 of the ECHR; doubts expressed about whether the scheme was consistent with the child's rights under the international instruments.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/21.html

Hoxha & Anor v Home Secretary
[2005] UKHL 19
House of Lords, 10 March 2005: REFUGEES; WOMEN

Unwillingness to return based upon the continuing effects of past persecution is insufficient to amount to well-founded fear although may be relevant for determining whether there is a current fear of persecution; discussion of sexual violence as grounds for fear.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/19.html

 

Liu v Home Secretary
[2005] EWCA Civ 249
Court of Appeal, 17 March 2005: IMMIGRATION; PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE

Approach to be taken in determining whether the decision to remove a non- national is a disproportionate, and therefore unlawful, interference with the latter's right to respect for his private and family life.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/
2005/249.html

 

Taylor v Lancashire County Council & Anor
[2005] EWCA Civ 284
Court of Appeal, 17 March 2005: STANDING; EQUALITY; PROPERTY; INTERPRETATION

A declaration of incompatibility with the Human Rights Act cannot be made on grounds which do not apply to the party seeking it; statutory scheme for possession of agricultural holdings based on use of the land did not unlawfully discriminate on grounds of property or status; consideration of use of Parliamentary materials in interpreting legislation.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/
2005/284.html

 

Chaudhary v Specialist Training Authority Appeal Panel & Ors
[2005] EWCA Civ 282
Court of Appeal, 16 March 2005: EQUALITY; FAIR HEARING

Specialist Training Authority Appeal Panel in refusing to grant a doctor Specialist Registrar status did neither unlawfully discriminate against him on racial grounds nor breach fair trial standards.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/
2005/282.html

 

Price & Ors v Leeds City Council
[2005] EWCA Civ 289
Court of Appeal, 16 March 2005: HOME; PROPERTY

A defendant could not raise by way of defence to an action for an order for possession of land that it would infringe his rights under Article 8 of the ECHR where a public authority demonstrates that it has an absolute right to such possession.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/
2005/289.html

 

Sellick & Anor, R v
[2005] EWCA Crim 651
Court of Appeal, 14 March 2005: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE, EQUALITY OF ARMS

Admission and reading of witness statements from witnesses who were absent either due to fear or to an inability to trace them following reasonable steps to do so did not, by denying the accused an opportunity to examine them, breach his fair trial rights.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/
2005/651.html

 

Bowman v Fels
[2005] EWCA Civ 226
Court of Appeal, 8 March 2005: ACCESS TO JUSTICE, LEGAL REPRESENTATION

Confidentiality of lawyer�client communications upheld in relation to statutory duty of disclosure under proceeds of crime legislation.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/
2005/226.html

 

Santiago v R
[2005] EWCA Crim 556
Court of Appeal, 8 March 2005: FAIR HEARING

Summary contempt proceedings were not biased.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/
2005/556.html

 

Button & Anor, R v
[2005] EWCA Crim 516
Court of Appeal, 4 March 2005: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE; PRIVATE LIFE

Evidence obtained in breach of Article 8 ECHR is not inadmissible per se.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/
2005/516.html

 

Steinberg v Pritchard Englefield & Anor
[2005] EWCA Civ 288
Court of Appeal, 3 March 2005: FAIR HEARING, LEGAL REPRESENTATION; EXPRESSION

No general requirement to provide legal aid to libel defendants.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/
2005/288.html

 

SB, R (on the application of) v Denbigh High School
[2005] EWCA Civ 199
Court of Appeal, 2 March 2005: RELIGION; EDUCATION; EQUALITY

School's uniform requirements failed to give sufficient weight to Muslim pupil's religious rights thereby resulting in her unlawful exclusion and denial of access to education.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/
2005/199.html

 

Corner House Research, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
[2005] EWCA Civ 192
Court of Appeal, 1 March 2005: ACCESS TO JUSTICE

Extensive discussion of principles for awarding costs in public interest litigation.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/
2005/192.html

 

Huang & Ors v Home Secretary
[2005] EWCA Civ 105
Court of Appeal, 1 March 2005: IMMIGRATION; PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE

Approach to be taken in determining whether the decision to remove a non- national is a disproportionate, and therefore unlawful, interference with the latter's right to respect for his private and family life.

Full text at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/
Civ/2005/105.html

 

UNITED STATES

City of Sherrill , New York v Oneida Indian Nation of New York & Ors
03-855
Supreme Court, 29 March 2005: INDIGENOUS PEOPLE; LAND

Indian tribe precluded from reviving historic land claims.

Full text at
www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/
04slipopinion.html

 

Jackson v Birmingham Board of Education
02-1672
Supreme Court, 29 March 2005: EQUALITY

Retaliation against a sex discrimination complainant can constitute intentional discrimination on the basis of sex where retaliation is because of complaint.

Full text at
www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/
04slipopinion.html

 

Muehler & Ors v Mena
03-1423
Supreme Court, 22 March 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY

Handcuffing during search of premises was reasonable to minimise harm to police officers and others; questioning about immigration status during search permitted.

Full text at
www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/
04slipopinion.html

 

Wilkinson v Dotson & Ors
03-287
Supreme Court, 22 March 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; REMEDIES

State prisoners could bring an action for declaratory and injunctive relief challenging the constitutionality of state parole procedures rather than seeking relief exclusively under habeas corpus.

Full text at
www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/
04slipopinion.html

 

Roper v Simmons
03-633
Supreme Court, 1 March 2005: DEATH PENALTY; CHILDREN; CRUEL, INHUMAN AND DEGRADING PUNISHMENT

Death penalty should not be imposed on offenders under 18.

Full text at
www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/
04slipopinion.html

 

February 2005

Last updated 1 March 2005.

AUSTRALIA

Kamleh v The Queen
[2005] HCA 2
High Court, 3 February 2005: FAIR HEARING; EVIDENCE

Evidence of out-of-court statements adduced to prove criminal intention was admissible.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/
2005/2.html

 

Nicholls v The Queen; Coates v The Queen
[2005] HCA 1
High Court, 3 February 2005: FAIR HEARING; EVIDENCE; BIAS

Admissibility of prior inconsistent statements allegedly made by witness off-video during police interview as exception to rule against admission of collateral statements.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/
HCA/2005/1.html

Applicants A104 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 19
Federal Court, 25 February 2005: REFUGEES

No evidence to suggest that alleged persecuted social group �known friends of militants' existed in Punjab; doubtful whether such an entity could constitute a social group for purposes of the 1951 Convention.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/
FCAFC/2005/19.html

 

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Lorenzo
[2005] FCAFC 13
Federal Court, 22 February 2005: MIGRATION; CHILDREN

Best interests of child must be primary consideration when cancelling parent's visa.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/
FCAFC/2005/13.html

 

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v SVBB
[2005] FCAFC 12
Federal Court, 22 February 2005: REFUGEES

Family blood feud did not qualify as a legitimate ground for fear of persecution under 1951 Convention.

Full text at
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/
FCAFC/2005/12.html

 

CANADA

R v Decorte
[2005] SCC 9
Supreme Court, 25 February 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; INDIGENOUS PEOPLE

Indigenous constables enjoyed the same powers as police officers in carrying out specified duties, including conducting breath tests; jurisdiction not limited to reserve territories enabling lawful arrest and detention at a road block on the outskirts.

Full text at
www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc9.html

 

R v Krymowski
[2005] SCC 7
Supreme Court, 24 February 2005: FREE EXPRESSION; MINORITIES

Statutory offence of wilful promotion of hatred against Roma covered �gypsies'.

Full text at
http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc7.html

 

Gorgiev v Minister of Human Resources Development
[2005] FCA 55
Federal Court of Appeal, 17 February 2005: FAIR HEARING; BIAS

Disclosure of rejected settlement offer by Disability Pensions Appeal Board did not result in a reasonable apprehension of bias against claimant.

Full text at
http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fca/2005/2005fca55.html

 

Almrei v Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
[2005] FCA 54
Federal Court of Appeal, 8 February 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT

Consideration of detention of non-national under security legislation with reference to recent UK and US decisions.

Full text at
http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/fca/2005/2005fca54.html

 

DOMINICA

Balson v The State
[2005] UKPC 2
Privy Council, 2 February 2005: DEATH PENALTY; CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT

Mandatory death penalty for murder constituted inhuman or degrading punishment or treatment.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/2.html

 

JAMAICA

Independent Jamaica Council for Human Rights (1998) Ltd & Ors v Marshall-Burnett & Anor (Jamaica)
[2005] UKPC 3
Privy Council, 3 February 2005: CONSTITUTIONALITY

Parliament altering right of appeal from Privy Council to Caribbean Court of Justice failed to adopt correct legislative procedures required for amending special constitutional provisions.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/2005/3.html

 

SOUTH AFRICA

Volks NO v Robinson & Ors
CCT 12/04
Constitutional Court, 21 February 2005: EQUALITY; MARRIAGE; DIGNITY

Different treatment of permanent life partners compared to married spouses concerning maintenance after death was justified on grounds that marriage entails different rights and obligations.

Full text at
http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/home.htm

 

Jaipal v The State
CCT 21/04
Constitutional Court, 18 February 2005: FAIR HEARING; BIAS

Presence of prosecutor, investigating officer, state witness and two presiding judicial assessors in the same office due to lack of space, whilst irregular, did not, in the particular circumstances of the case, result in an unfair trial although it had the potential to do so.

Full text at
http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/home.htm

 

UNITED KINGDOM

Williamson & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Employment & Ors
[2005] UKHL 15
House of Lords, 24 February 2005: CHILDREN; CORPORAL PUNISHMENT; RELIGION; EDUCATION

Ban on corporal punishment did not violate religious rights of head teachers, teachers and parents of children at independent schools.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/15.html

Al-Hasan, R (on the application of) v Home Secretary
[2005] UKHL 13
House of Lords, 16 February 2005: FAIR HEARING; BIAS; PRISONERS

Adjudicator's prior involvement in and lack of dissent concerning the approval of a squat search of a prisoner could lead to reasonable apprehension of bias in relation to his subsequent determination of a challenge to the order.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/13.html

 

Greenfield, R (on the application of) v Home Secretary
[2005] UKHL 14
House of Lords, 16 February 2005: FAIR HEARING; PRISONERS; REMEDIES

Prisoner facing a criminal charge was wrongly denied legal representation by a Private Prison Deputy Controller who was not an independent and impartial tribunal for the purposes of Article 6 of the ECHR; consideration of damages for breach.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/14.html

 

Polanski v Conde Nast Publications Ltd
[2005] UKHL 10
House of Lords, 10 February 2005: FAIR HEARING, EVIDENCE; EXPRESSION

Plaintiff in libel action who was unable to travel to give oral evidence due to threat of extradition was entitled to give evidence via video link.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/10.html

 

Saggar, Re
[2005] EWCA Civ 174
Court of Appeal, 24 February 2005: FAIR HEARING, DELAY

Consideration of reasonable time in context of whether alleged delay by Customs in seeking to reopen a defendant's confiscation order, so as to increase the �amount which might be realised' under it, breached Article 6(1) of the ECHR.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/174.html

 

Nunn, R (on the application of) v First Secretary of State & Ors
[2005] EWCA Civ 101
Court of Appeal, 8 February 2005: FAIR HEARING

Incompetent operation of local planning scheme did not affect its legality for the purposes of Article 6 of the ECHR; application for judicial review of planning inspector's decision to quash enforcement notices against mobile phone company for relocation of masts denied.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/101.html

 

Brunt & Ors v Southampton International Airport
[2005] EWCA Civ 93
Court of Appeal, 7 February 2005: EQUALITY; PROPERTY

Process for filtering out claims for compensation for aircraft noise did not constitute unfair discrimination; property rights did not entitle residents living near airports to compensation.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/93.html

 

Mlauzi v Home Secretary
[2005] EWCA Civ 128
Court of Appeal, 7 February 2005: REFUGEES; CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT

Zimbabwean opposition supporter granted asylum on grounds that she was at risk of persecution throughout country beyond her own locality.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/128.html

 

Inland Revenue & Anor v Deutsche Morgen Grenfell Group plc
[2005] EWCA Civ 78
Court of Appeal, 4 February 2005: FAIR HEARING; PROPERTY

Restitution proceedings for taxes paid under regulations later declared invalid involved the determination of the applicant's civil rights within the meaning of Article 6(1) of the ECHR.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/78.html

 

Dow Jones Co Inc v Jameel
[2005] EWCA Civ 75
Court of Appeal, 3 February 2005: EXPRESSION; REMEDIES

Presumption of damage in libel law is not incompatible with the right to free expression.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/75.html

 

Jameel & Anor v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl (No 2)
[2005] EWCA Civ 74
Court of Appeal, 3 February 2005: EXPRESSION

Presumption of falsity once defamation is proved does not breach right to free expression; consideration of test for satisfying Reynolds defence of qualified privilege.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/74.html

 

Momodou, R v
[2005] EWCA Crim 177
Court of Appeal, 2 February 2005: FAIR HEARING

Exercise of the trial judge's discretion to discharge an individual juror or the entire jury for impropriety, requires him to address the question whether impropriety has in fact occurred, and if it has, whether it can be cured, and if so how, or whether it is irremediable.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2005/177.html

B v Home Secretary
[2005] EWCA Civ 61
Court of Appeal, 1 February 2005: REFUGEES; RAPE; CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT; MENTAL HEALTH

Risk of psychiatric injury insufficient to give rise to a well founded fear of persecution under 1951 Convention; risk of rape will only give rise where state agent is implicated; severity of risk required to engage Article 3 of the ECHR.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/61.html

 

UNITED STATES

Johnson v California
03-636
Supreme Court, 23 February 2005: PRISONERS; EQUALITY

Strict scrutiny based on consideration of individual cases required in justifying racial segregation of prisoners.

Full text at
www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/
04slipopinion.html

 

Smith v Massachusetts
03-8661
Supreme Court, 22 February 2005: FAIR HEARING, DOUBLE JEOPARDY

Reversing a not guilty finding mid-trial following an earlier withdrawl of the charge by the prosecution and resubmitting it to the jury breached the double jeopardy rule.

Full text at
www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/
04slipopinion.html

 

January 2005

Last updated 8 February 2005.

CANADA

R v Grandinetti
2005 SCC 5
Supreme Court, 27 January 2005: FAIR HEARING; EVIDENCE

Statements made by the accused to undercover police officers were inadmissible as not being made voluntarily to �persons in authority'.

Full text at
http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2005/2005scc5.html

 

HONG KONG

Ng Yat Chi v Max Share Ltd & Anor
[2005] HKCFA 7
Court of Final Appeal, 20 January 2005: ACCESS TO JUSTICE

Principles governing abuse of process by vexatious litigants.

Full text at
www.hklii.org/hk/jud/en/hkcfa/2005/
FACV000005_2004.html

 

JAMAICA

Shervin Emmanuel v The Commissioner of Correction
[2004] HCV 1055
Supreme Court, 19 October 2004: EXTRADITION; EVIDENCE

Extradition hearing complied with evidentiary and due process rules.

Full text at
http://www.sc.gov.jm/Judgments/htmfiles/sc2004.htm

UNITED KINGDOM

D (a minor), R (on the application of) v Camberwell Green Youth Court
[2005] UKHL 4
House of Lords, 27 January 2005: FAIR HEARING; EVIDENCE; CHILDREN

New scheme governing evidence by child witnesses in criminal cases was compatible with Article 6 ECHR.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/4.html


Gregg v Scott
[2005] UKHL 2
House of Lords, 27 January 2005: HEALTH; REMEDIES

Availability of remedies in medical negligence cases.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/2.html


Smith (R) on the application of the Parole Board
[2005] UKHL 1
House of Lords, 27 January 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; PRISONERS; FAIR HEARING; EQUALITY OF ARMS

Prisoners had right to oral hearing when seeking to resist revocation of their parole licence.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/1.html


Bangs v Connex South Eastern Ltd.
[2005] EWCA Civ 14
Court of Appeal, 27 January 2005: FAIR HEARING; DELAY; APPEAL; WORK

Principles governing an appeal from an employment tribunal on grounds of unreasonable delay. Unreasonable delay, whilst it can be a breach of the right to a fair hearing, is a matter of fact and not law and as such does not constitute an independent ground of appeal.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/14.html


ID & Ors v Home Office
[2005] EWCA Civ 38
Court of Appeal, 27 January 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; ACCESS TO JUSTICE; REMEDIES; CRUEL, INHUMAN AND DEGRADING TREATMENT; LIFE; FAMILY LIFE; REFUGEES

Roma family had right to bring claim for false imprisonment and for breaches of Articles 2, 3, 5 and 8 ECHR following continuing detention by immigration authorities.

Full text at
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/38.html

UNITED STATES

Clark v Martinez
03-878
Supreme Court, 12 January 2005: LIBERTY & SECURITY; DEPORTATION

Authorities could only detain non nationals due to be deported beyond the maximum 90 days period for only as long as it was reasonably necessary to achieve removal; same rules should be applied to all subjects regardless of their status.

Full text at
www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/
04slipopinion.html

 

 

 

 

Commonwealthnet - the monthly human rights case round-up
Commonwealth and international human rights case law databases
Subscribe to bulletin/digest
Download the annual review
Virtual network on non-discrimination and minority rights
Legal Resource Library

This site has been designed and hosted by eMosaic. It was previously hosted by the University of Essex